439
edits
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Is that a mistake? | Is that a mistake? | ||
I'm not sure where you saw that. Today NSS_Shutdown will not complete if there are open references. That is true, and will continue to be true. That was not what it was saying. It was saying the some applications that switch profiles expect NSS_Shutdown to shutdown independent of any existing libraries that may have opened NSS it the meantime. This says the NSS_Shutdown needs to ignore any open context and just shutdown (to the best of it's ability). If it weren't for this case, I would have suggested that NSS_Shutdown basically do an NSS_ShutdownContext(NULL). | > I'm not sure where you saw that. Today NSS_Shutdown will not complete if there are open references. That is true, and will continue to be true. That was not what it was saying. It was saying the some applications that switch profiles expect NSS_Shutdown to shutdown independent of any existing libraries that may have opened NSS it the meantime. This says the NSS_Shutdown needs to ignore any open context and just shutdown (to the best of it's ability). If it weren't for this case, I would have suggested that NSS_Shutdown basically do an NSS_ShutdownContext(NULL). | ||
== Why count unique contexts? == | == Why count unique contexts? == | ||
edits