XUL:Remote XUL bugs: Difference between revisions

XUL:Remote XUL bugs (view source)

207 bytes added , 13 June 2006

m

added comment about dynamic remote xul applications

1

edit

Revision as of 14:56, 5 May 2006 (view source) Jraymond (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:38, 13 June 2006 (view source) HansH (talk \| contribs) m (added comment about dynamic remote xul applications) Newer edit →
Line 61:		Line 61:

	Of course, I think the best is to sign our remote XUL application which I did without success (i.e. the signed code was treated as if it was invalid so I must have done something wrong along the way). There is much more I would like to say but not sure this is the appropriate place.		Of course, I think the best is to sign our remote XUL application which I did without success (i.e. the signed code was treated as if it was invalid so I must have done something wrong along the way). There is much more I would like to say but not sure this is the appropriate place.

			(Hans Harder) Signing remote XUL applications sounds nice, but how about dynamic remote XUL application, in other words how do I sign XUL applications which are dynamicly generated by remote perl scripts ?