14
edits
Electronical (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Electronical (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
interested in reviewing this addon in the future (if it's not already taken by someone) and then when a new version is submitted, they get an email | interested in reviewing this addon in the future (if it's not already taken by someone) and then when a new version is submitted, they get an email | ||
It might be handy to include the version notes available too, so reviewers don't have to search for them. Most updated extensions are not very different than their predecessor, but only add something (like locales etc.). | |||
--[[User:Electronical|Electronical]] 04:44, 31 August 2006 (PDT) | |||
== shaverthoughts(tm) == | == shaverthoughts(tm) == | ||
| Line 98: | Line 99: | ||
After having a few discussions with extension developers, I found that they would really appreciate more information about the reviewing procedure. There is a section at [[Update:Website:DevelopersSection#Approval_Queue]], but the procedure entry is not filled yet. | After having a few discussions with extension developers, I found that they would really appreciate more information about the reviewing procedure. There is a section at [[Update:Website:DevelopersSection#Approval_Queue]], but the procedure entry is not filled yet. | ||
Maybe it's a good idea to include a link to a extension developer faq (or the wiki section) in the denial email message. | Maybe it's a good idea to include a link to a extension developer faq (or the wiki section) in the denial email message. | ||
--[[User:Electronical|Electronical]] 04:44, 31 August 2006 (PDT) | |||
edits