Update:Remora Licensing: Difference between revisions

Added info about po files and adjusted todo.
(more todo)
(Added info about po files and adjusted todo.)
Line 4: Line 4:


For new files, whack the tri-license boilerplate on it:
For new files, whack the tri-license boilerplate on it:
* For php files, [http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/boilerplate-1.1/mpl-tri-license-c here's the boilerplate].
* For most of the files, c multiline commentes are the way to go (php, thtml, etc.), [http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/boilerplate-1.1/mpl-tri-license-c here's the boilerplate].
* For the l10n messages.po files, I don't think multiline comments are acceptable, so use [http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/boilerplate-1.1/mpl-tri-license-sh this style] instead.


The Original Code is "addons.mozilla.org site"
The Original Code is "addons.mozilla.org site"
Line 18: Line 19:
* services/ - stuff from v2 that's not licensed
* services/ - stuff from v2 that's not licensed
* site/app/controllers/components - From v1 I think.  
* site/app/controllers/components - From v1 I think.  
* site/app/locale - have to talk to clouserw about the existing info on those files.
* site/app/tests/test_helper.php - Original file from http://cakephp.org/pastes/show/8803bd09150cb65cc7da63f92cdbc828 ...
* site/app/tests/test_helper.php - Original file from http://cakephp.org/pastes/show/8803bd09150cb65cc7da63f92cdbc828 ...
* site/app/webroot/ - some of this is cake/MIT, so need to be careful. Do we want licensing in css and js files? Means the user has to download them so probably not the best idea. What's the protocol on images? Maybe just a LICENSE file in the directory? What about directories with images from cake and images we made ourselves?  
* site/app/webroot/ - some of this is cake/MIT, so need to be careful. Do we want licensing in css and js files? Means the user has to download them so probably not the best idea. What's the protocol on images? Maybe just a LICENSE file in the directory? What about directories with images from cake and images we made ourselves?  
* Perhaps some license information in the top directory? (next to services and site)
* Perhaps some license information in the top directory? (next to services and site)
126

edits