License Policy/Mozilla Project Licensing: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


It's not complete; there are a load of website projects missing, most of which I suspect are 3-clause BSD because Playdoh is. We do so many of those I can't keep track.
It's not complete; there are a load of website projects missing, most of which I suspect are 3-clause BSD because Playdoh is. We do so many of those I can't keep track.
==Projects And Their Licenses==


mozilla-central and comm-central are actually still mostly tri-licensed ({{bug|716478}}) but we are acting as if they have already been upgraded.  
mozilla-central and comm-central are actually still mostly tri-licensed ({{bug|716478}}) but we are acting as if they have already been upgraded.  


{|
{| border="1"
!Project Name
!Project Name
!License
!License
Line 144: Line 146:
|Unlabelled ("Undecided", apparently)
|Unlabelled ("Undecided", apparently)
|}
|}


==Arguments Deployed for Non-Copyleft Licenses==
==Arguments Deployed for Non-Copyleft Licenses==
Line 170: Line 171:


"[W]e want to keep Shumway BSD to maximize adoption by others." -- [https://github.com/mozilla/shumway/commit/d634b365a1d13c33adc6a38fa5e57b8155f2dace agal, 2012-01-08]
"[W]e want to keep Shumway BSD to maximize adoption by others." -- [https://github.com/mozilla/shumway/commit/d634b365a1d13c33adc6a38fa5e57b8155f2dace agal, 2012-01-08]


==Developer Opinions==
==Developer Opinions==


[https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.legal/vSr8Gat9LAY/oRQk2wTVAWEJ bsmedberg feels] that all non-product code should be BSD.
[https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.legal/vSr8Gat9LAY/oRQk2wTVAWEJ bsmedberg feels] that all non-product code should be BSD.
Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,925

edits

Navigation menu