DNT false patent claim: Difference between revisions

DNT false patent claim (view source)

15 bytes added , 15 June 2012

Confirmed users

152

edits

Revision as of 21:42, 15 June 2012 (view source) Afowler (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:43, 15 June 2012 (view source) Afowler (talk \| contribs) (→‎Statement of Mozilla on Patent Claim related to Do Not Track) Newer edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:

	If Mr. Cranstone intends to provide a RF license for DNT, we applaud him and remain happy to work with him to find the right form whether it be a covenant not to sue, statement, or other license structure, but it has to work for everyone and be free of unnecessary representations and conditions.		If Mr. Cranstone intends to provide a RF license for DNT, we applaud him and remain happy to work with him to find the right form whether it be a covenant not to sue, statement, or other license structure, but it has to work for everyone and be free of unnecessary representations and conditions.

			= Prior Art =