1,926
edits
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* en_windows_vista_x86_dvd_X12-34293.iso from http://fs | * en_windows_vista_x86_dvd_X12-34293.iso from http://fs | ||
** 2.0 -> 2.0.0.1 (unsigned, releasetest channel) - PASS | ** 2.0 -> 2.0.0.1 (unsigned, releasetest channel) - '''PASS''' | ||
*** Only worked for me when using "Run as administrator". | *** Only worked for me when using "Run as administrator". | ||
** 2.0 -> 2.0.0.1 (signed, betatest channel) - PASS: | ** 2.0 -> 2.0.0.1 (signed, betatest channel) - '''PASS''': | ||
*** I was able to successfully update 2.0->2.0.0.1 on the betatest channel (to signed 2.0.0.1 rc1 build)... but need to know how I can verify that I ended up with "signed" files. | *** I was able to successfully update 2.0->2.0.0.1 on the betatest channel (to signed 2.0.0.1 rc1 build)... but need to know how I can verify that I ended up with "signed" files. | ||
*** The only interesting thing to note about the update is that after restart, I was asked by Vista if I wanted "updater.exe" to do it's thing...and I had to grant permission. I'm assuming this is expected behavior? | *** The only interesting thing to note about the update is that after restart, I was asked by Vista if I wanted "updater.exe" to do it's thing...and I had to grant permission. I'm assuming this is expected behavior? | ||
edits