Mobile/Readabilityv2: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 77: Line 77:
*Basic Typography Features are slightly better on iOS than Android - UPDATE: An initial comparison of iOS Safari to Nightly 17 on Android http://cl.ly/0p3X2A3U3F0N<br>
*Basic Typography Features are slightly better on iOS than Android - UPDATE: An initial comparison of iOS Safari to Nightly 17 on Android http://cl.ly/0p3X2A3U3F0N<br>


==Implementation Options==
==Implementation Considerations==
* Open question: How much should we revisit font inflation decisions?<br>
* Question: How much should we revisit font inflation decisions?<br>
*Shipping our own fonts to replace:<br>
*Shipping our own fonts to replace:<br>
**verdana, georgia, times <br>
**verdana, georgia, times <br>
Line 92: Line 92:
* Ultra-high Density Display Support <br>
* Ultra-high Density Display Support <br>
* Very Low Density Display Support (B2G @ 320 x 480) <br>
* Very Low Density Display Support (B2G @ 320 x 480) <br>
* Text-size-adjust standardization?
* Text-size-adjust standardization? <br>
**Can we seek out people who left Apple for spec comments? They're likely still be bound by NDA.
*We have our own text engine, but not our own fonts. Can we leverage that?
*We have our own text engine, but not our own fonts. Can we leverage that?
canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
5,401

edits

Navigation menu