Firefox3/StatusMeetings/2007-11-06: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 150: Line 150:
* Should go in for '''beta 3''':
* Should go in for '''beta 3''':
** The next 10% most important blockers
** The next 10% most important blockers
* Should be cut from Firefox 3:
** New features that have not gone in yet.
** Any patch with too much risk of regressions to go in at the beginning of the beta 2 cycle (because there will never be a safer time to land them)


=== Beta 2 criteria, proposal 3 ===
"Importance" should be judged largely on how much the bug would "prevent users from browsing the web on a daily basis".  This allows bugs to be compared on equal footing whether they are crashes, regressions, Leopard bugs, or even long-standing bugs that we had hoped to fix in Firefox 3.
 
* Should be cut:
** Too much risk of regressions, even at the beginning of the beta 2 cycle.
** Features
* Should be suspicious of anything on the beta 2 list that isn't a "bugs that prevents many users from browsing the web on a daily basis" or a security issue.


=== Blockers and Noms ===
=== Blockers and Noms ===
Confirmed users
729

edits

Navigation menu