1
edit
Mozilla2:Unified Storage: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 270: | Line 270: | ||
databases (like bugzilla is doing): imagine storing your bookmarks on a remote server using one sql db for it | databases (like bugzilla is doing): imagine storing your bookmarks on a remote server using one sql db for it | ||
It should be written with db independence in mind | It should be written with db independence in mind | ||
=== Comments from piers7 (just a random user) === | |||
It seems to me from the POV of a user that one of the most important things to consider is not the implementation, it's the interface. | |||
One of my big gripes with Firefox is keeping my bookmarks in sync with IE. To this task there's been a whole host of extensions written, of varying calibre, all of which miss the holy grail of making both browsers '''just share the same store'''. I'm thinking of a simple strategy pattern where the default 'NetscapeBookmarkStore' was swappable with an 'IEFavoratesStore' and a whole host of others (eg '3rdPartyNetworkBasedBookmarkStore' etc...) | |||
Unified Storage may simplify matters for the developers, but it's an extensible, modular, plugable storage architecture that'll ultimately deliver the most benefit to the end users. | |||