QA/Turning On Search Suggestions: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
< QA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 169: Line 169:


= References =
= References =
* Meta bug:
** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1344919 1344919 - META - search suggestions and one-off buttons in Awesome Bar] <br />
* List and links for specs
* List and links for specs
  List and links for available specs - documents, user stories, specifications
** Useful info about Awesomebar search at [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/search-suggestions-firefox link]
* Meta bug
 
= Testcases =  
= Testcases =  
== Test Areas ==
== Test Areas ==

Revision as of 11:48, 11 May 2017

Revision History

This section describes the modifications that have been made to this wiki page. A new row has been completed each time the content of this document is updated (small corrections for typographical errors do not need to be recorded). The description of the modification contains the differences from the prior version, in terms of what sections were updated and to what extent.

Date Version Author Description
05/11/2017 1.0 Simona Badau Created first draft

Overview

Purpose

Detail the purpose of this document. For example:

  • The test scope, focus areas and objectives
  • The test responsibilities
  • The test strategy for the levels and types of test for this release
  • The entry and exit criteria
  • The basis of the test estimates
  • Any risks, issues, assumptions and test dependencies
  • The test schedule and major milestones
  • The test deliverables

Scope

This wiki details the testing that will be performed by the project team for the <project name> project. It defines the overall testing requirements and provides an integrated view of the project test activities. Its purpose is to document:

  • What will be tested
  • How testing will be performed

Ownership

Development
Manager: Panagiotis Astithas (irc: past)
Developer contacts: Marco Bonardo (irc: mak)

Engineering Team - Nightly Testing:
Rares Bologa (irc: RaresB) - PM for QA team
Brindusa Tot (irc: brindusat) - leading QA efforts
Simona Badau (irc: simonab) - QA

Testing summary

Scope of Testing

In Scope

Turning On Search Suggestions is a Mozilla feature that aims to enable the search suggestions by default and give the users the possibility to disable them (before Firefox 55, the search suggestions were disabled by default and the users were asked to enable them).

With this feature, a new hint is displayed in the Awesome's bar dropdown informing the users (that had the search suggestions enabled or that ignored the enabling/disabling of them) about the enabling of the search suggestions. The users that had the search suggestions blocked previously, won't see the hint and the search suggestions won't be enabled in their case.

Out of Scope

Testing of other functionalities of the Awesome bar that are not related to the enabling of the search suggestions are not in the interest of testing for this feature.

Requirements for testing

Environments

Full testing will be performed on the following OSes:

  • Windows, probably Windows 7 and Windows 10
  • Mac OS X
  • Ubuntu


Other configuration/environmental setup needed:

  • Search suggestions in the Awesome Bar can be enabled/disabled by checking/unchecking the option "Show search suggestions in location bar results" in about:preferences#general.

Test Strategy

Risk Assessment and Coverage

ID Description / Threat Description Covered by Test Objective Magnitude Probability Priority Impact Score
RAC-1 Awesomebar and One offs functionality/performance might be affected by the enabling of the search suggestions TO-1 2-Moderate 1-Unlikely 3-High 6
RAC-2 Enabling the search suggestions by default confuses users because the search suggestions hint not noticeable enough TO-1 3-High 3-Almost Certain 3-High 27
RAC-3 The search suggestions hint is displayed also to the non targeted users TO-2 2-Moderate 2-Possible 3-High 12
RAC-4 The search suggestions are enabled also for the non targeted users TO-2 2-Moderate 2-Possible 3-High 12

Values:

  • Magnitude: 1- Low , 2-Moderate, 3-High
  • Probability: 1-Unlikely, 2-Possible, 3-Almost Certain
  • Priority: 1 - Low, 2-Medium, 3-High

Impact Score Breakdown:

  • An impact value of 1, 2, 3, 4 would describe an area which although should be covered there aren't expected any discoveries of critical issues.
  • An impact value of 6, 8, 9, 12 would describe an area in which we expect to find issues but those issues are not expected to be critical.
  • An impact value of 18 or 27 would describe an area on which it is likely to find issues and those issues to be critical or blockers.

Test Objectives

This section details the progression test objectives that will be covered. Please note that this is at a high level. For large projects, a suite of test cases would be created which would reference directly back to this master. This could be documented in bullet form or in a table similar to the one below.

Ref Function Test Objective Evaluation Criteria Test Type RAC Owners
1 Search suggestions hint Search suggestions hint is displayed for the users that do not have the search suggestions blocked The hint informing users that search suggestions are enabled is displayed in the Awesome bar drop down just under the URL Manual RAC-1, RAC-2, RAC-3 Eng Team
2 Search suggestions disabling Search suggestions in the Awesome Bar can be disabled Clicking on Change Settings in the search suggestions hint takes you to the about:preferences#general from where search suggestions can be disabled Manual Eng Team
3 Accessibility Search suggestions and the hint announcing them being enabled are visible and usable from accessibility point of view Testing for accessibility includes:

- testing using high Contract themes
- Screen Reader validation
- Keyboard-only

Manual Eng Team
4 Upgrade-Downgrade The search suggestions hint behavior at FF Upgrade/Downgrade One-Off searches Awesomebar buttons are not lost during FF upgrade/downgrade Manual Eng Team

Builds

This section should contain links for builds with the feature

  • Links for Nightly builds:
    • First Landed on Nightly 55.0a1 - to be updated after the enabling of the search suggestions is done.
  • Links for Beta builds

Test Execution Schedule

The following table identifies the anticipated testing period available for test execution.

Project phase Start Date End Date
Start project 2017.04.04 TBD
Study documentation/specs received from developers 2017.04.04 2017.04.05
QA - Test plan creation 2017.05.11 2017.05.11
QA - Test cases/Env preparation 2017.04.04 2017.04.06
QA - Nightly Testing
QA - Beta Testing
Release Date

Testing Tools

Detail the tools to be used for testing, for example see the following table:

Process Tool
Test plan creation Mozilla wiki
Test case creation TestRail/ Google docs
Test case execution TestRail
Bugs management Bugzilla

Status

Overview

Track the dates and build number where feature was released to Nightly
Track the dates and build number where feature was merged to Release/Beta


References


  • List and links for specs
    • Useful info about Awesomebar search at link

Testcases

Test Areas

Test Areas Covered Details
Private Window
Multi-Process Enabled
Multi-process Disabled
Theme (high contrast)
UI
Mouse-only operation
Keyboard-only operation
Display (HiDPI)
Interaction (scroll, zoom)
Usable with a screen reader e.g. with NVDA
Usability and/or discoverability testing Is this feature user friendly
RTL build testing
Help/Support
Help/support interface required Make sure link to support/help page exist and is easy reachable.
Support documents planned(written) Make sure support documents are written and are correct.
Install/Upgrade
Feature upgrades/downgrades data as expected
Does sync work across upgrades
Requires install testing separate feature/application installation needed (not only Firefox)
Affects first-run or onboarding Florin/Lawrence are investigating if there is a dedicated QA for this, or we should test? Should be an yes/no and if is yes should add in detail column the team/person assigned.
Does this affect partner builds? Partner build testing yes/no options, add comment with details about who will lead testing
Enterprise Raise up the topic to developers to see if they are expecting to work different on ESR builds
Enterprise administration
Network proxies/autoconfig
ESR behavior changes
Locked preferences
Data Monitoring
Temporary or permanent telemetry monitoring List of error conditions to monitor
Telemetry correctness testing
Server integration testing
Offline and server failure testing
Load testing
Add-ons If add-ons are available for testing feature, or is current feature will affect some add-ons, then API testing should be done for the add-on.
Addon API required?
Comprehensive API testing
Permissions
Testing with existing/popular addons
Security Security is in charge of Matt Wobensmith. We should contact his team to see if security testing is necessary for current feature.
3rd-party security review
Privilege escalation testing
Fuzzing
Web Compatibility depends on the feature
Testing against target sites
Survey of many sites for compatibility
Interoperability depends on the feature
Common protocol/data format with other software: specification available. Interop testing with other common clients or servers.
Coordinated testing/interop across the Firefoxes: Desktop, Android, iOS
Interaction of this feature with other browser features

Test suite

Full Test suite - Link to test rail - testcases should be added under Firefox Desktop project link
Smoke Test suite - Link with the tests - if available/needed.
Regression Test suite - Link with the tests - if available/needed.

Bug Work

Meta bug: 12345 - bug summary

Logged bugs ( blocking 12345 )
Full Query
ID Priority Component Assigned to Summary Status Target milestone
15069 P3 Networking jefft File type url not correctly parsed and created VERIFIED M13

1 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 1 Verified (100%);


Bug fix verification
Full Query
ID Priority Component Assigned to Summary Status Resolution Target milestone
15069 P3 Networking jefft File type url not correctly parsed and created VERIFIED FIXED M13

1 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 1 Verified (100%);

Sign off

Criteria

Checklist

  • All test cases should be executed
  • Has sufficient automated test coverage (as measured by code coverage tools) - coordinate with RelMan
  • All blockers, criticals must be fixed and verified or have an agreed-upon timeline for being fixed (as determined by engineering/RelMan/QA)

Results

Nightly testing

List of OSes that will be covered by testing

  • Link for the tests run
    • Full Test suite, link to TestRail - Tests Runs and Results link
    • Daily Smoke, if needed/available
    • Regression Test suite, if needed/available


Merge to Beta Sign-off
List of OSes that will be covered by testing

  • Link for the tests run
    • Full Test suite

Checklist

Exit Criteria Status Notes/Details
Testing Prerequisites (specs, use cases)
Testing Infrastructure setup
Test Plan Creation
Test Cases Creation
Automation Coverage
Performance Testing
All Defects Logged
Critical/Blockers Fixed and Verified
Metrics/Telemetry
Basic/Core functionality Nightly testing
QA mid-Nightly Signoff Email to be sent
QA Nightly - Full Testing
QA pre-Beta Signoff Email to be sent
QA Beta - Full Testing
QA pre-Release Signoff Email to be sent