Reps/Application Process/Selection Criteria: Difference between revisions
< Reps | Application Process
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(badge suggestion from Lucy) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
</li><li> what would be his commitment period to the program? (3 months, 6months etc) | </li><li> what would be his commitment period to the program? (3 months, 6months etc) | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li>Open to work in collaboration</li></ul> | <li>Open to work in collaboration</li> | ||
<li>Badge system for prospective Reps? [http://openmatt.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/badges-in-the-real-world/]</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
Revision as of 17:41, 28 March 2011
Selection criteria for ReMo applicants
The following are suggested criteria that ReMo council members should consider when making a decision on whether or not to select a ReMo applicant:
- how long has the applicant been involved in the Mozilla project
- how knowledgeable is the applicant of the Mozilla Project, our mission and our values
- what are the applicant's main motivations to join ReMo
- do you feel this person would explain Mozilla well to a public audience?
- do you feel this person is genuinely interested in helping promote Mozilla ?
- is the applicant already involved in other community-driven projects?
- is the applicant familiar with the different products Mozilla develops and different Mozilla initiatives (eg. Drumbeat, Firefox Live etc..)
- nomination/recommendation from team leader, eg OpenMatt for drumbeat, maryc for marketing
- will the applicant be able to pull together his own resources at times even though if Mozilla is unable to provide? example: designing presentations, press releases, make own swag?
- what would be his commitment period to the program? (3 months, 6months etc)
- Open to work in collaboration
- Badge system for prospective Reps? [1]