Silent Update not now prompt: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
2) Zero or one of two Add-ons become supported, but because there's one add-on that is still unsupported, we don't remind or bring up any additional prompts until all Add-ons are supported or the next Firefox update becomes available. | 2) Zero or one of two Add-ons become supported, but because there's one add-on that is still unsupported, we don't remind or bring up any additional prompts until all Add-ons are supported or the next Firefox update becomes available. | ||
<b>Things to note here</b> -- the reason to go down the path of not forcing our users to upgrade if there are unsupported Add-ons is the following: | |||
1) Mozilla wants to continue to stand by our mission of user sovereignty and choice. Forcing users to update doesn't offer them this choice. | 1) Mozilla wants to continue to stand by our mission of user sovereignty and choice. Forcing users to update doesn't offer them this choice. | ||
2) Although our goal of updating users is primarily around ensuring a safe, secure web browsing experience, some users are comfortable making the trade-off of not being secure for functionality that is important to them. If we force an update and break certain functionality that defines their web experience, we may push them away from Firefox all together. The end result may be users who a) leave Firefox for Chrome/Safari/IE and b) continue to be insecure (threat to others and themselves without knowing it) because they need and expect the functionality the Add-on previously offered them. | 2) Although our goal of updating users is primarily around ensuring a safe, secure web browsing experience, some users are comfortable making the trade-off of not being secure for functionality that is important to them. If we force an update and break certain functionality that defines their web experience, we may push them away from Firefox all together. The end result may be users who a) leave Firefox for Chrome/Safari/IE and b) continue to be insecure (threat to others and themselves without knowing it) because they need and expect the functionality the Add-on previously offered them. | ||
|Feature requirements= | |Feature requirements=Leveraging the new changes to the Add-on compatibility checker, Firefox will create a new dialog showing users all (if there are any) unsupported Add-ons | ||
* | Dialog should offer two options: | ||
* | *"Not now" (wait X days and continue to check if there are new updates for the unsupported Add-ons) | ||
*"Update" (users can manually decide to continue the update since they don't care about the incompatible Add-ons) | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{FeatureInfo | {{FeatureInfo |
Revision as of 17:34, 26 August 2011
Status
Silent Update - Create 'not now' dialog for unsupported Add-ons | |
Stage | Definition |
Status | In progress |
Release target | ` |
Health | OK |
Status note | ` |
{{#set:Feature name=Silent Update - Create 'not now' dialog for unsupported Add-ons
|Feature stage=Definition |Feature status=In progress |Feature version=` |Feature health=OK |Feature status note=` }}
Team
Product manager | Chris Lee |
Directly Responsible Individual | Chris Lee |
Lead engineer | ` |
Security lead | ` |
Privacy lead | ` |
Localization lead | ` |
Accessibility lead | ` |
QA lead | ` |
UX lead | ` |
Product marketing lead | ` |
Operations lead | ` |
Additional members | ` |
{{#set:Feature product manager=Chris Lee
|Feature feature manager=Chris Lee |Feature lead engineer=` |Feature security lead=` |Feature privacy lead=` |Feature localization lead=` |Feature accessibility lead=` |Feature qa lead=` |Feature ux lead=` |Feature product marketing lead=` |Feature operations lead=` |Feature additional members=` }}
Open issues/risks
`
Stage 1: Definition
1. Feature overview
Related to the Add-ons Compatibility Check feature, users who have Add-ons that are unsupport when a silent update takes place in the background, Firefox will alert them that certain Add-ons have become invalid and they have two options:
1) Continue with the upgrade (more secure, latest features, etc.) because the invalid add-ons are not important to the user.
OR
2) User can select "not now" and wait X days for the Add-on developers to update their code to become compatible with the latest version of Firefox.
2. Users & use cases
Sandra is using Firefox to check her email and at the same time in the background, Firefox is being updated to the latest version. However, as Firefox runs through the installation it also checks for Add-ons, it identifies two Add-ons that are unsupported with the new version of Firefox.
There is a prompt that surfaces to Sandra informing her of the new update and which Add-ons are unsupported. She is given two options to 1) continue with the update and ignore the Add-ons because they are irrelevant to her or 2) select "not now" where Firefox will check on a daily basis AMO to see if the specific Add-ons have been updated to become compatible.
There are two scenarios that can take place here:
1) Both Add-ons become supported over the next couple days and the Firefox update happens in the background successfully and Sandra is able to use the most secure, full-feature browser in the market
2) Zero or one of two Add-ons become supported, but because there's one add-on that is still unsupported, we don't remind or bring up any additional prompts until all Add-ons are supported or the next Firefox update becomes available.
Things to note here -- the reason to go down the path of not forcing our users to upgrade if there are unsupported Add-ons is the following:
1) Mozilla wants to continue to stand by our mission of user sovereignty and choice. Forcing users to update doesn't offer them this choice. 2) Although our goal of updating users is primarily around ensuring a safe, secure web browsing experience, some users are comfortable making the trade-off of not being secure for functionality that is important to them. If we force an update and break certain functionality that defines their web experience, we may push them away from Firefox all together. The end result may be users who a) leave Firefox for Chrome/Safari/IE and b) continue to be insecure (threat to others and themselves without knowing it) because they need and expect the functionality the Add-on previously offered them.
3. Dependencies
`
4. Requirements
Leveraging the new changes to the Add-on compatibility checker, Firefox will create a new dialog showing users all (if there are any) unsupported Add-ons
Dialog should offer two options:
- "Not now" (wait X days and continue to check if there are new updates for the unsupported Add-ons)
- "Update" (users can manually decide to continue the update since they don't care about the incompatible Add-ons)
Non-goals
`
Stage 2: Design
5. Functional specification
`
6. User experience design
`
Stage 3: Planning
7. Implementation plan
`
8. Reviews
Security review
`
Privacy review
`
Localization review
`
Accessibility
`
Quality Assurance review
`
Operations review
`
Stage 4: Development
9. Implementation
`
Stage 5: Release
10. Landing criteria
` {{#set:Feature open issues and risks=` |Feature overview=Related to the Add-ons Compatibility Check feature, users who have Add-ons that are unsupport when a silent update takes place in the background, Firefox will alert them that certain Add-ons have become invalid and they have two options:
1) Continue with the upgrade (more secure, latest features, etc.) because the invalid add-ons are not important to the user.
OR
2) User can select "not now" and wait X days for the Add-on developers to update their code to become compatible with the latest version of Firefox. |Feature users and use cases=Sandra is using Firefox to check her email and at the same time in the background, Firefox is being updated to the latest version. However, as Firefox runs through the installation it also checks for Add-ons, it identifies two Add-ons that are unsupported with the new version of Firefox.
There is a prompt that surfaces to Sandra informing her of the new update and which Add-ons are unsupported. She is given two options to 1) continue with the update and ignore the Add-ons because they are irrelevant to her or 2) select "not now" where Firefox will check on a daily basis AMO to see if the specific Add-ons have been updated to become compatible.
There are two scenarios that can take place here:
1) Both Add-ons become supported over the next couple days and the Firefox update happens in the background successfully and Sandra is able to use the most secure, full-feature browser in the market
2) Zero or one of two Add-ons become supported, but because there's one add-on that is still unsupported, we don't remind or bring up any additional prompts until all Add-ons are supported or the next Firefox update becomes available.
Things to note here -- the reason to go down the path of not forcing our users to upgrade if there are unsupported Add-ons is the following:
1) Mozilla wants to continue to stand by our mission of user sovereignty and choice. Forcing users to update doesn't offer them this choice. 2) Although our goal of updating users is primarily around ensuring a safe, secure web browsing experience, some users are comfortable making the trade-off of not being secure for functionality that is important to them. If we force an update and break certain functionality that defines their web experience, we may push them away from Firefox all together. The end result may be users who a) leave Firefox for Chrome/Safari/IE and b) continue to be insecure (threat to others and themselves without knowing it) because they need and expect the functionality the Add-on previously offered them. |Feature dependencies=` |Feature requirements=Leveraging the new changes to the Add-on compatibility checker, Firefox will create a new dialog showing users all (if there are any) unsupported Add-ons
Dialog should offer two options:
- "Not now" (wait X days and continue to check if there are new updates for the unsupported Add-ons)
- "Update" (users can manually decide to continue the update since they don't care about the incompatible Add-ons)
|Feature non-goals=` |Feature functional spec=` |Feature ux design=` |Feature implementation plan=` |Feature security review=` |Feature privacy review=` |Feature localization review=` |Feature accessibility review=` |Feature qa review=` |Feature operations review=` |Feature implementation notes=` |Feature landing criteria=` }}
Feature details
Priority | P1 |
Rank | 999 |
Theme / Goal | Experience |
Roadmap | Firefox Desktop |
Secondary roadmap | ` |
Feature list | Desktop |
Project | ` |
Engineering team | ` |
{{#set:Feature priority=P1
|Feature rank=999 |Feature theme=Experience |Feature roadmap=Firefox Desktop |Feature secondary roadmap=` |Feature list=Desktop |Feature project=` |Feature engineering team=` }}
Team status notes
status | notes | |
Products | ` | ` |
Engineering | ` | ` |
Security | ` | ` |
Privacy | ` | ` |
Localization | ` | ` |
Accessibility | ` | ` |
Quality assurance | ` | ` |
User experience | ` | ` |
Product marketing | ` | ` |
Operations | ` | ` |
{{#set:Feature products status=`
|Feature products notes=` |Feature engineering status=` |Feature engineering notes=` |Feature security status=` |Feature security health=` |Feature security notes=` |Feature privacy status=` |Feature privacy notes=` |Feature localization status=` |Feature localization notes=` |Feature accessibility status=` |Feature accessibility notes=` |Feature qa status=` |Feature qa notes=` |Feature ux status=` |Feature ux notes=` |Feature product marketing status=` |Feature product marketing notes=` |Feature operations status=` |Feature operations notes=` }}