Elmo/Meetings/2012-06-04: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
< Elmo‎ | Meetings
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{SUBPAGENAME}} <small> [[Elmo/Meetings/{{#time: Y-m-d | {{SUBPAGENAME}} -1 week}}|« previous meeting]] — index – [[Elmo...")
 
 
Line 18: Line 18:


==Meeting Notes==
==Meeting Notes==
 
* Attendees: peterbe, laura, Pike
* Attendees: peterbe
* data1.1 patch
*  
** manual testing it locally
** breaks the Team page
*** rows are for repos
*** "my appversion tree magic"
** wants to land this as soon as possible
* ES?
** still waiting for feedback from Will
* Sandstone
** tabzilla is in flux
*** Pike: questionning if we should maybe be able to "override" the links in the tabzilla
** CSS grid framework is in flux
* "dashboard" for webstuff (RiK, mkelly)
** affiliates
*** Pike suspects they only know about Verbatim in terms of l10n
*** peterbe to talk to mkelly to find out if should build an API for them. maybe. perhaps.
* K9o, API needed?
** no(!)
* Any others needing us to expose an API
** not quite yet
** if we build something, it'll be about people (working on what?)


==Action Items==
==Action Items==

Latest revision as of 17:51, 4 June 2012


« previous meetingindexnext week » create?

Meeting Details

  • Time and location: Monday, 10am PST, conf bridge 359
  • irc.mozilla.org #elmo for back-channel

Previous Action Items


Meeting Notes

  • Attendees: peterbe, laura, Pike
  • data1.1 patch
    • manual testing it locally
    • breaks the Team page
      • rows are for repos
      • "my appversion tree magic"
    • wants to land this as soon as possible
  • ES?
    • still waiting for feedback from Will
  • Sandstone
    • tabzilla is in flux
      • Pike: questionning if we should maybe be able to "override" the links in the tabzilla
    • CSS grid framework is in flux
  • "dashboard" for webstuff (RiK, mkelly)
    • affiliates
      • Pike suspects they only know about Verbatim in terms of l10n
      • peterbe to talk to mkelly to find out if should build an API for them. maybe. perhaps.
  • K9o, API needed?
    • no(!)
  • Any others needing us to expose an API
    • not quite yet
    • if we build something, it'll be about people (working on what?)

Action Items