Mozilla 2:Obsolete APIs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== Process Goals ===== | ===== Process Goals ===== | ||
A lightweight | A lightweight [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_Comments Request For Comments] protocol seems appropriate given the wide audience of Mozilla platform developers. We need to reach out to hackers whose work is hosted at [http://addons.mozilla.org AMO], [http://mozdev.org mozdev.org], and other such sites. We should try to reach the [http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2006/12/xul_dark_matter.html XUL Dark Matter] bodies out there on the galactic rim. The goal should be to propose and discuss with plenty of time for two-way communication leading to consensus on which APIs go away, what their replacements are, and what new APIs are needed that we haven't already planned. | ||
Comments and contributions welcome. | Comments and contributions welcome. | ||
/be | /be | ||
Revision as of 01:41, 18 January 2007
See Gecko:Obsolete_API, for APIs that are already considered obsolete. We should aspire to remove these from Mozilla 2.
Process Goals
A lightweight Request For Comments protocol seems appropriate given the wide audience of Mozilla platform developers. We need to reach out to hackers whose work is hosted at AMO, mozdev.org, and other such sites. We should try to reach the XUL Dark Matter bodies out there on the galactic rim. The goal should be to propose and discuss with plenty of time for two-way communication leading to consensus on which APIs go away, what their replacements are, and what new APIs are needed that we haven't already planned.
Comments and contributions welcome.
/be