Talk:Firefox/Feature Brainstorming:Default Browser UI: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(SUGGESTION) |
(Please uses QT instead of GTK+) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*yert: Ok, so here is something I would like to see. A better throbber. The one we have now is icky for those who used Netscape, with the excellent meteors. I propose we ask [[http://www.mozilla-japan.org/ Mozilla: Japan]] for the use of a running animation of Firefox-ko, even though he is not a Red Panda. | *yert: Ok, so here is something I would like to see. A better throbber. The one we have now is icky for those who used Netscape, with the excellent meteors. I propose we ask [[http://www.mozilla-japan.org/ Mozilla: Japan]] for the use of a running animation of Firefox-ko, even though he is not a Red Panda. | ||
[[Picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moezilla#Firefox-ko]] | [[Picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moezilla#Firefox-ko]] | ||
== Please uses QT instead of GTK+ == | |||
Firefox runs so slow not because of GTK+, but xul | |||
switching to QT isn't a workaround | |||
Epiphany (GNOMES's browser) runs much faster than Firefox and it is also on GTK+ | |||
Revision as of 18:45, 10 March 2007
- yert: Ok, so here is something I would like to see. A better throbber. The one we have now is icky for those who used Netscape, with the excellent meteors. I propose we ask [Mozilla: Japan] for the use of a running animation of Firefox-ko, even though he is not a Red Panda.
Picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moezilla#Firefox-ko
Please uses QT instead of GTK+
Firefox runs so slow not because of GTK+, but xul switching to QT isn't a workaround Epiphany (GNOMES's browser) runs much faster than Firefox and it is also on GTK+