Mozilla 2/Strings/Dynamic Analysis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Conversion counts: fix typo) |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* Dynamic analysis: autostring buffer-copy counts (are autostrings worthwhile)? | * Dynamic analysis: autostring buffer-copy counts (are autostrings worthwhile)? | ||
Procedure: todo | Procedure: todo [dmandelin] I think here you are asking for the fraction of nsAutoStrings that end up having to allocate space on the heap after the string grows. Is that right? | ||
Revision as of 00:47, 15 February 2008
<< back to Mozilla 2/Strings
The cost/benefit of UTF8
Question: If we moved from our current UCS2/UTF16 storage for nsAString to UTF8, what would the impact be on memory usage?
Procedure:
Instrument nsStringBuffer with a large linked-list (with locking and all that good stuff). Run the instrumented browser and collect data about all nsStringBuffers which hold PRUnichar data:
- What is the size of the buffer
- What would the size of the buffer be in UTF8?
- Is the buffer pure-ASCII?
Conversion counts
Question: how much do we currently convert between UTF8 and UTF16?
Procedure: Instrument the number of calls to ConvertUTF8toUTF16 and ConvertUTF16toUTF8.
Bonus points: group and identify common callstacks
Autostring value
- Dynamic analysis: autostring buffer-copy counts (are autostrings worthwhile)?
Procedure: todo [dmandelin] I think here you are asking for the fraction of nsAutoStrings that end up having to allocate space on the heap after the string grows. Is that right?