QA/Firefox3/TestPlan/PostMortem: Difference between revisions

m
Line 35: Line 35:
* Keep the PRD up to date!  An outdated PRD for certain sections, kept QA from knowing what new features were landing and obscuring out testplans.  [tchung]
* Keep the PRD up to date!  An outdated PRD for certain sections, kept QA from knowing what new features were landing and obscuring out testplans.  [tchung]
** Also, having a better ETA on dates when these features were going to land would help QA know when to expect them in builds [tchung]
** Also, having a better ETA on dates when these features were going to land would help QA know when to expect them in builds [tchung]
* more communication and updates across the board (eg. graphical changes)
* status meetings has details, but a dashboard or quick status would be easier to take in.
* Flag major changes for the week so QA knows ahead of time.
* Status meetings were inconsistent (some developers were there every week, but others were not avaliable for update status)
* earlier accessibility UI reviews in the process (awesome bar had huge adjustments late in the game)
* Include QA into more review discussions
* Don't jam so many changes into a release (web changes, animated favicon -- broke release)
* More automation for BFT's
Confirmed users
6,361

edits