Drumbeat/Challenges/Privacy Icons: Difference between revisions
< Drumbeat
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Narcisgarcia (talk | contribs) (LIPADP) |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Background''' | '''Background''' | ||
Those interested in the idea are encouraged to read Aza Razkin's blog post [http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/making-privacy-policies-not-suck/ Making Privacy Policies not Suck] which got this idea rolling within the Drumbeat community | Those interested in the idea are encouraged to read Aza Razkin's blog post [http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/making-privacy-policies-not-suck/ Making Privacy Policies not Suck] which got this idea rolling within the Drumbeat community. | ||
'''The Challenge''': | '''The Challenge''': | ||
Design a simple set of icons that can educate users of the privacy policies of websites. (Think of something as simple as the Fair Trade Coffee label on food or creative commons logos for copyright) | Design a simple set of icons that can educate users of the privacy policies of websites. (Think of something as simple as the Fair Trade Coffee label on food or creative commons logos for copyright) | ||
[[Drumbeat/Challenges/Privacy_Icons/Notes | Notes]] from the Privacy Forum | |||
'''Objective''':<br> | '''Objective''':<br> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
*Increase internet users awareness about privacy issues | *Increase internet users awareness about privacy issues | ||
*Educate internet users on privacy policies of websites | *Educate internet users on privacy policies of websites | ||
*Establish, and move the online service industry to adopt, a standard around privacy and terms of service | *Establish, and move the online service industry to adopt, a standard around privacy and terms of service (or push online services to adopt better practices) | ||
| Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
*Commissioned a Japanese design company to do some initial design work | *Commissioned a Japanese design company to do some initial design work | ||
'' | ''Key Questions/Criteria'':<br> | ||
#Assess what aspects of privacy we want/can visualize<br> | #Assess what aspects of privacy we want/can visualize<br> | ||
| Line 38: | Line 37: | ||
#Draft the legal orthogonal statements: a) a list of privacy “settings” we are trying to visualize; and b) an outline of the “on” and “off” states of these privacy “settings”<br> | #Draft the legal orthogonal statements: a) a list of privacy “settings” we are trying to visualize; and b) an outline of the “on” and “off” states of these privacy “settings”<br> | ||
'' | ''Timeline'' | ||
This process is draft - how/if we proceed is still very much up in the air and will depend on consultations with a number of people. | |||
#Design challenge | #Have a class of law students draft the legal orthogonal statements | ||
#Crowdsource | #Have a group of lawyers/students poke holes/test the orthogonal statements | ||
#Have a group of lawyers/students assess what challenges lawyers will have with the the final product/assess how to make these statements binding/link to standard language in terms of use contracts | |||
#For each orthogonal statement ask drumbeat community members to submit visual themes or ideas that might convey the essence of that statement | |||
#Design challenge - run a competition to design the "look and feel" of the icons | |||
#Crowdsource the logic of the icons. Ask community members to test where the icons work and when to they break (e.g. works in a business setting, not in personal setting or a given icon does not work on website "x") | |||
#Crowdsource consumer reviews of websites (like all the social networking sites) using the icons | #Crowdsource consumer reviews of websites (like all the social networking sites) using the icons | ||
#Determine who will be the curator of this project? (e.g. What will the governance be? (Mozilla, a spin-off, other?)<br><br> | #Determine who will be the curator of this project? (e.g. What will the governance be? (Mozilla, a spin-off, other?)<br><br> | ||
| Line 47: | Line 52: | ||
''Immediate Next Steps'' | ''Immediate Next Steps'' | ||
* | *Determine an appropriate question or Challenge for Zittrain and Ryan's classes<br> | ||
| Line 55: | Line 58: | ||
*Concept is explainable – icons need to be as simple as creative commons | *Concept is explainable – icons need to be as simple as creative commons | ||
*Each privacy issue must have an “on” or “off” ( | *Each privacy issue must have an “on” or “off” (safe or unsafe) state<br> | ||
'''Other Resources''': | |||
*[http://www.actiu.info/lipadp/ LIPADP], "Individual licenses for personal documents" ([http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.actiu.info%2Flipadp%2F&sl=ca&tl=en translated]) | |||
*[http://www.privacychoice.org/whos_watching Privacy Choice] has a web site that achieves some of the functionality Aza envisioned. | |||
*Ryan Calo is working with a German designer and some Google 20%ers on a symbol system for email (Link?) | |||
*[http://www.futureofprivacy.org/ The Future of Privacy Forum] is creating a behavioral advertising brand ([http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/business/media/27adco.html press coverage]) | |||
*[http://knowprivacy.org/ KnowPrivacy.org] is a UC Berkeley project which analyzed [http://knowprivacy.org/complaints.html privacy complaints] to the FTC in order to develop a set of [http://knowprivacy.org/policies_methodology.html privacy icons] which were later assigned to the [http://knowprivacy.org/profiles Top50 internet companies] based on evaluation of their privacy policies ([http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/security/privacy/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217701421 press coverage] [http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2009/06/01/daily22.html 2]) | |||
* [http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/gerv/archives/2010/03/the_economics_of_privacy.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+HackingForChrist+%28Hacking+for+Christ%29 The Economics of Privacy] - A blog post by Gerv on how people value privacy. | |||
'''Contributors''': | |||
*Julie Martin, Mozilla, legal strategy | |||
*Aza Raskin, Mozilla, product strategy, design, overall leadership | |||
*Lauren Gelman, legal strategy | |||
*[http://www.dharmishta.com Dharmishta Rood], documentation and strategy | |||
*[http://commonspace.wordpress.com Mark Surman], Mozilla, drumming up participation and resource, promoting | |||
*Gillian Hadfield, USC Law, thinking about legal framework | |||
*[http://zak.greant.com Zak Greant], [http://blog.lexpubli.ca LexPublica], promoting, strategy, user experience, docs | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Latest revision as of 08:39, 27 August 2010
Privacy Icons
Background
Those interested in the idea are encouraged to read Aza Razkin's blog post Making Privacy Policies not Suck which got this idea rolling within the Drumbeat community.
The Challenge:
Design a simple set of icons that can educate users of the privacy policies of websites. (Think of something as simple as the Fair Trade Coffee label on food or creative commons logos for copyright)
Notes from the Privacy Forum
Objective:
- Create a simple standard to explain privacy policies (make privacy policies not suck) and terms of service
- Enable web users to make better choices when picking and using web services
- Enable web users to have more control over their privacy
- Increase internet users awareness about privacy issues
- Educate internet users on privacy policies of websites
- Establish, and move the online service industry to adopt, a standard around privacy and terms of service (or push online services to adopt better practices)
Strategy:
Launch a design challenge that involves experts and the community to create icons that can summarize privacy policies.
Program Outline:
Already completed:
- Commissioned a Japanese design company to do some initial design work
Key Questions/Criteria:
- Assess what aspects of privacy we want/can visualize
- Determine what, if any online privacy related legal text can be modularized
- Draft the legal orthogonal statements: a) a list of privacy “settings” we are trying to visualize; and b) an outline of the “on” and “off” states of these privacy “settings”
Timeline
This process is draft - how/if we proceed is still very much up in the air and will depend on consultations with a number of people.
- Have a class of law students draft the legal orthogonal statements
- Have a group of lawyers/students poke holes/test the orthogonal statements
- Have a group of lawyers/students assess what challenges lawyers will have with the the final product/assess how to make these statements binding/link to standard language in terms of use contracts
- For each orthogonal statement ask drumbeat community members to submit visual themes or ideas that might convey the essence of that statement
- Design challenge - run a competition to design the "look and feel" of the icons
- Crowdsource the logic of the icons. Ask community members to test where the icons work and when to they break (e.g. works in a business setting, not in personal setting or a given icon does not work on website "x")
- Crowdsource consumer reviews of websites (like all the social networking sites) using the icons
- Determine who will be the curator of this project? (e.g. What will the governance be? (Mozilla, a spin-off, other?)
Immediate Next Steps
- Determine an appropriate question or Challenge for Zittrain and Ryan's classes
Design Criteria:
- Concept is explainable – icons need to be as simple as creative commons
- Each privacy issue must have an “on” or “off” (safe or unsafe) state
Other Resources:
- LIPADP, "Individual licenses for personal documents" (translated)
- Privacy Choice has a web site that achieves some of the functionality Aza envisioned.
- Ryan Calo is working with a German designer and some Google 20%ers on a symbol system for email (Link?)
- The Future of Privacy Forum is creating a behavioral advertising brand (press coverage)
- KnowPrivacy.org is a UC Berkeley project which analyzed privacy complaints to the FTC in order to develop a set of privacy icons which were later assigned to the Top50 internet companies based on evaluation of their privacy policies (press coverage 2)
- The Economics of Privacy - A blog post by Gerv on how people value privacy.
Contributors:
- Julie Martin, Mozilla, legal strategy
- Aza Raskin, Mozilla, product strategy, design, overall leadership
- Lauren Gelman, legal strategy
- Dharmishta Rood, documentation and strategy
- Mark Surman, Mozilla, drumming up participation and resource, promoting
- Gillian Hadfield, USC Law, thinking about legal framework
- Zak Greant, LexPublica, promoting, strategy, user experience, docs