Firefox/Content Performance Program/Observations: Difference between revisions

Firefox/Content Performance Program/Observations (view source)

Revision as of 20:27, 22 October 2015

572 bytes added , 22 October 2015

Scroll between GFX and e10s configurations (Firefox) - data

Avih

Confirmed users

95

edits

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 ** On each config, run the bookmarklet few times and register the result (average and stddev) of a single run which seems typical
 * Tested configurations: all the combinations of the following:
-** Page: [http://facebook.com/llbean facebook] / [http://twitter.com/Lord_Voldemort7 twitter] / [https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p=mozilla&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002 Yahoo search results] / [https://www.google.com/search?q=spectrum&tbm=isch google image search results]
+** Page: [http://facebook.com/llbean facebook] / [https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p=mozilla&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002 Yahoo search results] / [https://www.google.com/search?q=spectrum&tbm=isch google image search results]
 ** e10s: Yes / No
 ** Power mode: balanced / power saver
@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 *** D3D11-warp, no-D2D
 * Observations:
-**
+** The google image search results scrolls best across configurations, yahoo results scroll somewhat worse, and facebook scrolls the worst of these pages.
+*** For this reason, it's probably better to use facebook for scroll benchmarks.
+** D2D1_1 scrolls worse than other D2D configs (including no-D2D) on different pages, different GFX configs, and e10s yes/no.
+** facebook scrolls quite badly with D3D11-warp and D3D9, especially with e10s.
+** Except for D2D1_1, D3D11-warp and D3D9, most other configs perform similarly.
+** With e10s, the performance differences between gfx configs seem more extreme than without e10s.
 ===== Navigation from google search results (between browsers) =====