Latest revision as of 23:59, 3 August 2017

Open Discussion

This page is very long. One more way to make it more manageable --

Thoughts?

--Mnot (talk) 23:40, 31 July 2017 (PDT)

More hesitant on this one, since work can (and does) overlap orgs, and it’s nicer (more findable/accessible) to be able to text-search one page to see who is working on what active standards effort now.

--Tantek (tantek.com) 06:23, 1 August 2017 (PDT)

(partially done) This page is very long. A couple of possible ways to make it more manageable -- --Mnot (talk) 23:40, 31 July 2017 (PDT)

Remove the emeritus section -- either completely, or into a separate page. This isn't terribly useful information.
- Good suggestion. Moved to separate page: Standards/emeritus. Tantek (tantek.com) 06:23, 1 August 2017 (PDT)
Remove the W3C Community Groups -- either completely, or into a separate page. Some (e.g., WICG) should probably stay, but there are so many...
- Moved all CGs not directly tied to a WG (e.g. WICG stayed) to separate page: Standards/w3c-interest-community-groups. Tantek (tantek.com) 16:58, 3 August 2017 (PDT)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 This page is very long. One more way to make it more manageable --
 * Split the top-level orgs into separate pages.
-** More hesitant on this one, since work can (and does) overlap orgs, and it’s nicer (more findable/accessible) to be able to text-search one page to see who is working on what active standards effort now. [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] ([http://tantek.com/ tantek.com]) 06:23, 1 August 2017 (PDT)
 Thoughts?
 --[[User:Mnot|Mnot]] ([[User talk:Mnot|talk]]) 23:40, 31 July 2017 (PDT)
+* More hesitant on this one, since work can (and does) overlap orgs, and it’s nicer (more findable/accessible) to be able to text-search one page to see who is working on what active standards effort now.
+--[[User:Tantek|Tantek]] ([http://tantek.com/ tantek.com]) 06:23, 1 August 2017 (PDT)
 = Done =