Firefox/Input/Feedback Strategy: Difference between revisions
(→Beta) |
|||
| Line 316: | Line 316: | ||
| class="header" | Report | | class="header" | Report | ||
| class="header" | Source | | class="header" | Source | ||
| class="header" | Responsibility | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 321: | Line 322: | ||
| | | | ||
* Input | * Input | ||
| | |||
* ? | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 326: | Line 329: | ||
| | | | ||
* Socorro | * Socorro | ||
| | |||
* ? | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 332: | Line 337: | ||
* Twitter | * Twitter | ||
* Facebook | * Facebook | ||
| | |||
* ? | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 337: | Line 344: | ||
| | | | ||
* SUMO forums | * SUMO forums | ||
| | |||
* ? | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 342: | Line 351: | ||
| | | | ||
* Test Pilot User Study (if available) | * Test Pilot User Study (if available) | ||
| | |||
* ? | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 347: | Line 358: | ||
| | | | ||
* Bugzilla | * Bugzilla | ||
| | |||
* ? | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 353: | Line 366: | ||
| | | | ||
* Metrics Dashboard | * Metrics Dashboard | ||
| | |||
* ? | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 358: | Line 373: | ||
| | | | ||
* Press/PR | * Press/PR | ||
| | |||
* ? | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 363: | Line 380: | ||
| | | | ||
* PMM | * PMM | ||
| | |||
* ? | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 22:52, 15 April 2011
Background
Firefox 4 was a success for user feedback with tens of thousands support threads and millions of pieces of feedback on Input. Unfortunately, we didn't integrate many other feedback mediums that offer more information about key aspects of the browser (i.e. stability, features, responsiveness, usability and performance). Mozilla encompasses many different mediums such as Socorro, Test Pilot, news sources, Bugs, Social Networks (i.e. facebook, twitter) and ADU's. The new rapid release process will require new feedback strategies to quickly enlighten drivers on the status quo of the browser across multiple channels
Current Feedback Offerings
| Source | Type | Options |
| SUMO |
|
|
| Socorro |
|
|
| Input |
|
|
| Bugzilla |
|
|
| Test Pilot |
|
|
| Press/PR |
|
|
| Social Media |
|
|
| ADUs |
|
|
| (Mobile only)
Reviews and Ratings |
|
|
| Forum/Newsgroup Comments |
|
|
Needs
- Central - The value of this channel is to shows bleeding edge features that may or may not end up in the release, but give a glimpse into Firefox's strategy/vision.
- Aurora - Users here will be able to experiment with new features and determine if they match quality criteria to be graduated to a release of Firefox proper.
- Beta - Users will be able to get the inside track on new features landing in Firefox proper and increase the overall quality of the new release by finding compatibility
- Release - We'll look for possible security and Top Issues and possible Chemspills on this channel.
| Regressions | Stability | Feature Quality | UX Feedback | Website Compat. | Plugin Compat. | Addon Compat. | Chemspills | |
| Central | X | X | ||||||
| Aurora | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Beta | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Release | X | X | X | X |
Objectives
- To form a group of feedback leads throughout the organization
- Create a comprehensive picture of what users are saying on a regular basis
Plan
Initially, we want to meet once a week to coalesce our findings for the needs over each release channel. The final output of each meeting will be a comprehensive report of all feedback summaries.
Central
Stakeholders
- Product Drivers
- Feature Teams
- QA
| Report | Source | Responsibility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurora
Stakeholders
- Product Drivers
- Feature Teams
- Marketing
- QA
| Report | Source | Responsibility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beta
Stakeholders
- Product Drivers
- Feature Teams
- Marketing
- Support
- QA
| Report | Source | Responsibility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release
Stakeholders
- Product Drivers
- Feature Teams
- Marketing
- Support
- Security
- RRRT
| Report | Source | Responsibility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open Questions
- Normalize counts across feedback channels?
- Reporting rates across feedback channels?
- How does press coverage work into this reporting system?
- What about bugs filed which are the most critical, but are not fixed?