Firefox/Beta/2011-05-09: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* What has QA done up to that point. | * What has QA done up to that point. | ||
* Stability report | * Stability report | ||
* Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition | * Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition. | ||
* Bugs we are tracking - 6 bugs. | * Bugs we are tracking - 6 bugs. | ||
* Go/No Go decision is about doing the merge. | * Go/No Go decision is about doing the merge. | ||
* Matt owns packaging this up for Monday's meeting. | |||
* Extension compatiblity - do we care about this? We probably can't make it part of the calculation for this time but in the future, this will be a bigger part of the criteria. | |||
* Would we delay going to Beta if an extension is not compatible? Probably something we need to take to the list. | |||
* 2 decisions: do a beta, did we do it correctly? | |||
====Agenda== | |||
* Schedule | |||
* Beta user stats | |||
* Stability report | |||
* Go/No Go decision | |||
* Repo/mechanics | |||
==Schedule== | |||
* Official "Go To" Beta is still May 17th. | |||
* The code that's in Aurora on the 16th, will move to Beta and we will do a build from there. | |||
* The merge happens and we have the choice at that time whether or not the update is put out for all the beta users or not. | |||
* We have 6 bugs we are tracking and we will either get them resolved or decide they are not severe enough to block. | |||
* Laura: When will people see this beta live? Probably a couple of days after we do the merge. We will want some time to test this. | |||
* Christian will work with Laura offline to figure out time line - log bugs for web pieces and everything that needs to happen when. | |||
==Beta user stats== | |||
* According to crash stats, yesterday's volume on 5.0b1 was 37K. | |||
* Over the weekend, getting about 11K hits on the first run page per day. | |||
* Last Thurs/Fri, about 15K hits. | |||
* John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that? | |||
* We are going to go to 100% for that group of people. | |||
* We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either. | |||
* John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that? | |||
* We are going to go to 100% for that group of people. | |||
* We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either. | |||
* Bump in numbers for the different locales...some growth there. | |||
==Stability report== | |||
* Top crash list similar to top crash list for Aurora. | |||
* No new or explosive crashes have been identified. | |||
* Still need more users on the channel. | |||
* <Sheila to add more notes> | |||
==Go/No Go== | |||
* Thread on the list | |||
* What data would QA present to help us make the Go/No Go decisions. | |||
* What has QA done up to that point. | |||
* Stability report | |||
* Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition. | |||
* Bugs we are tracking - 6 bugs. | |||
* Go/No Go decision is about doing the merge. | |||
* Matt owns packaging this up for Monday's meeting. | |||
* Extension compatiblity - do we care about this? We probably can't make it part of the calculation for this time but in the future, this will be a bigger part of the criteria. | |||
* Would we delay going to Beta if an extension is not compatible? Probably something we need to take to the list. | |||
==Repo/Mechanics== | |||
* Still an issue with l10n but it doesn't affect the merge on May 17th. This would relate to the next merge from Aurora-Beta. | |||
Revision as of 21:36, 9 May 2011
Agenda
- Schedule
- Beta user stats
- Stability report
- Go/No Go decision
- Repo/mechanics
Schedule
- Official "Go To" Beta is still May 17th.
- The code that's in Aurora on the 16th, will move to Beta and we will do a build from there.
- The merge happens and we have the choice at that time whether or not the update is put out for all the beta users or not.
- We have 6 bugs we are tracking and we will either get them resolved or decide they are not severe enough to block.
- Laura: When will people see this beta live? Probably a couple of days after we do the merge. We will want some time to test this.
- Christian will work with Laura offline to figure out time line - log bugs for web pieces and everything that needs to happen when.
Beta user stats
- According to crash stats, yesterday's volume on 5.0b1 was 37K.
- Over the weekend, getting about 11K hits on the first run page per day.
- Last Thurs/Fri, about 15K hits.
- John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that?
- We are going to go to 100% for that group of people.
- We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either.
- John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that?
- We are going to go to 100% for that group of people.
- We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either.
- Bump in numbers for the different locales...some growth there.
Stability report
- Top crash list similar to top crash list for Aurora.
- No new or explosive crashes have been identified.
- Still need more users on the channel.
- <Sheila to add more notes>
==Go/No Go
- Thread on the list
- What data would QA present to help us make the Go/No Go decisions.
- What has QA done up to that point.
- Stability report
- Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition.
- Bugs we are tracking - 6 bugs.
- Go/No Go decision is about doing the merge.
- Matt owns packaging this up for Monday's meeting.
- Extension compatiblity - do we care about this? We probably can't make it part of the calculation for this time but in the future, this will be a bigger part of the criteria.
- Would we delay going to Beta if an extension is not compatible? Probably something we need to take to the list.
- 2 decisions: do a beta, did we do it correctly?
==Agenda
- Schedule
- Beta user stats
- Stability report
- Go/No Go decision
- Repo/mechanics
Schedule
- Official "Go To" Beta is still May 17th.
- The code that's in Aurora on the 16th, will move to Beta and we will do a build from there.
- The merge happens and we have the choice at that time whether or not the update is put out for all the beta users or not.
- We have 6 bugs we are tracking and we will either get them resolved or decide they are not severe enough to block.
- Laura: When will people see this beta live? Probably a couple of days after we do the merge. We will want some time to test this.
- Christian will work with Laura offline to figure out time line - log bugs for web pieces and everything that needs to happen when.
Beta user stats
- According to crash stats, yesterday's volume on 5.0b1 was 37K.
- Over the weekend, getting about 11K hits on the first run page per day.
- Last Thurs/Fri, about 15K hits.
- John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that?
- We are going to go to 100% for that group of people.
- We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either.
- John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that?
- We are going to go to 100% for that group of people.
- We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either.
- Bump in numbers for the different locales...some growth there.
Stability report
- Top crash list similar to top crash list for Aurora.
- No new or explosive crashes have been identified.
- Still need more users on the channel.
- <Sheila to add more notes>
Go/No Go
- Thread on the list
- What data would QA present to help us make the Go/No Go decisions.
- What has QA done up to that point.
- Stability report
- Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition.
- Bugs we are tracking - 6 bugs.
- Go/No Go decision is about doing the merge.
- Matt owns packaging this up for Monday's meeting.
- Extension compatiblity - do we care about this? We probably can't make it part of the calculation for this time but in the future, this will be a bigger part of the criteria.
- Would we delay going to Beta if an extension is not compatible? Probably something we need to take to the list.
Repo/Mechanics
- Still an issue with l10n but it doesn't affect the merge on May 17th. This would relate to the next merge from Aurora-Beta.