Firefox/Beta/2011-05-09: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
< Firefox‎ | Beta
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 37: Line 37:
* What has QA done up to that point.
* What has QA done up to that point.
* Stability report
* Stability report
* Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition
* Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition.
* Bugs we are tracking - 6 bugs.
* Bugs we are tracking - 6 bugs.
* Go/No Go decision is about doing the merge.
* Go/No Go decision is about doing the merge.
* Matt owns packaging this up for Monday's meeting.
* Extension compatiblity - do we care about this? We probably can't make it part of the calculation for this time but in the future, this will be a bigger part of the criteria.
* Would we delay going to Beta if an extension is not compatible? Probably something we need to take to the list.
* 2 decisions: do a beta, did we do it correctly?
====Agenda==
* Schedule
* Beta user stats
* Stability report
* Go/No Go decision
* Repo/mechanics
==Schedule==
* Official "Go To" Beta is still May 17th.
* The code that's in Aurora on the 16th, will move to Beta and we will do a build from there.
* The merge happens and we have the choice at that time whether or not the update is put out for all the beta users or not.
* We have 6 bugs we are tracking and we will either get them resolved or decide they are not severe enough to block.
* Laura: When will people see this beta live? Probably a couple of days after we do the merge. We will want some time to test this.
* Christian will work with Laura offline to figure out time line - log bugs for web pieces and everything that needs to happen when.
==Beta user stats==
* According to crash stats, yesterday's volume on 5.0b1 was 37K.
* Over the weekend, getting about 11K hits on the first run page per day.
* Last Thurs/Fri, about 15K hits.
* John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that?
* We are going to go to 100% for that group of people.
* We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either.
* John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that?
* We are going to go to 100% for that group of people.
* We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either.
* Bump in numbers for the different locales...some growth there.
==Stability report==
* Top crash list similar to top crash list for Aurora.
* No new or explosive crashes have been identified.
* Still need more users on the channel.
* <Sheila to add more notes>
==Go/No Go==
* Thread on the list
* What data would QA present to help us make the Go/No Go decisions.
* What has QA done up to that point.
* Stability report
* Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition.
* Bugs we are tracking - 6 bugs.
* Go/No Go decision is about doing the merge.
* Matt owns packaging this up for Monday's meeting.
* Extension compatiblity - do we care about this? We probably can't make it part of the calculation for this time but in the future, this will be a bigger part of the criteria.
* Would we delay going to Beta if an extension is not compatible? Probably something we need to take to the list.
==Repo/Mechanics==
* Still an issue with l10n but it doesn't affect the merge on May 17th. This would relate to the next merge from Aurora-Beta.

Revision as of 21:36, 9 May 2011

Agenda

  • Schedule
  • Beta user stats
  • Stability report
  • Go/No Go decision
  • Repo/mechanics

Schedule

  • Official "Go To" Beta is still May 17th.
  • The code that's in Aurora on the 16th, will move to Beta and we will do a build from there.
  • The merge happens and we have the choice at that time whether or not the update is put out for all the beta users or not.
  • We have 6 bugs we are tracking and we will either get them resolved or decide they are not severe enough to block.
  • Laura: When will people see this beta live? Probably a couple of days after we do the merge. We will want some time to test this.
  • Christian will work with Laura offline to figure out time line - log bugs for web pieces and everything that needs to happen when.

Beta user stats

  • According to crash stats, yesterday's volume on 5.0b1 was 37K.
  • Over the weekend, getting about 11K hits on the first run page per day.
  • Last Thurs/Fri, about 15K hits.
  • John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that?
  • We are going to go to 100% for that group of people.
  • We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either.
  • John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that?
  • We are going to go to 100% for that group of people.
  • We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either.
  • Bump in numbers for the different locales...some growth there.

Stability report

  • Top crash list similar to top crash list for Aurora.
  • No new or explosive crashes have been identified.
  • Still need more users on the channel.
  • <Sheila to add more notes>

==Go/No Go

  • Thread on the list
  • What data would QA present to help us make the Go/No Go decisions.
  • What has QA done up to that point.
  • Stability report
  • Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition.
  • Bugs we are tracking - 6 bugs.
  • Go/No Go decision is about doing the merge.
  • Matt owns packaging this up for Monday's meeting.
  • Extension compatiblity - do we care about this? We probably can't make it part of the calculation for this time but in the future, this will be a bigger part of the criteria.
  • Would we delay going to Beta if an extension is not compatible? Probably something we need to take to the list.
  • 2 decisions: do a beta, did we do it correctly?

==Agenda

  • Schedule
  • Beta user stats
  • Stability report
  • Go/No Go decision
  • Repo/mechanics

Schedule

  • Official "Go To" Beta is still May 17th.
  • The code that's in Aurora on the 16th, will move to Beta and we will do a build from there.
  • The merge happens and we have the choice at that time whether or not the update is put out for all the beta users or not.
  • We have 6 bugs we are tracking and we will either get them resolved or decide they are not severe enough to block.
  • Laura: When will people see this beta live? Probably a couple of days after we do the merge. We will want some time to test this.
  • Christian will work with Laura offline to figure out time line - log bugs for web pieces and everything that needs to happen when.

Beta user stats

  • According to crash stats, yesterday's volume on 5.0b1 was 37K.
  • Over the weekend, getting about 11K hits on the first run page per day.
  • Last Thurs/Fri, about 15K hits.
  • John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that?
  • We are going to go to 100% for that group of people.
  • We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either.
  • John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that?
  • We are going to go to 100% for that group of people.
  • We probably don't need to stop at 100K users either.
  • Bump in numbers for the different locales...some growth there.

Stability report

  • Top crash list similar to top crash list for Aurora.
  • No new or explosive crashes have been identified.
  • Still need more users on the channel.
  • <Sheila to add more notes>

Go/No Go

  • Thread on the list
  • What data would QA present to help us make the Go/No Go decisions.
  • What has QA done up to that point.
  • Stability report
  • Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition.
  • Bugs we are tracking - 6 bugs.
  • Go/No Go decision is about doing the merge.
  • Matt owns packaging this up for Monday's meeting.
  • Extension compatiblity - do we care about this? We probably can't make it part of the calculation for this time but in the future, this will be a bigger part of the criteria.
  • Would we delay going to Beta if an extension is not compatible? Probably something we need to take to the list.


Repo/Mechanics

  • Still an issue with l10n but it doesn't affect the merge on May 17th. This would relate to the next merge from Aurora-Beta.