QA/QA Companion Design Center: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
< QA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: We need some space to brainstorm ways to make the QA Companion a better tool. == Bug Analysis == We have [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=...)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
|-
|-
|P3
|P3
|Bug that would be good to have, but would not shed too many tears if we had to ship with it
|"Nice to have's", things we'd like to fix, but we'd still ship with if we had to
|-
|-
|P4
|P4

Revision as of 22:23, 16 October 2008

We need some space to brainstorm ways to make the QA Companion a better tool.

Bug Analysis

We have 30 bugs currently against the QA Comapanion (QAC).

I went through each of them and gave them a priority. I think that the next version of the QAC will fix P1 and P2 bugs as well as one or two new features.

To that end, I followed the following criteria when distributing priorities:

Priority Qualifications
P1 Core usability broken, High Profile feature, crash
P2 High profile bug, significantly declines usability or user experience
P3 "Nice to have's", things we'd like to fix, but we'd still ship with if we had to
P4 Bug that is pretty low priority, and we'll get to "someday"
P5 Administrative issues with the product, IT decisions etc