Project Fission/iframe-crawler: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Add rhunt's suggestions/requests) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Ideas and requests == | == Ideas and requests == | ||
=== Outstanding === | |||
* Do a crawl with Fission turned off, and a crawl with it turned on, taking screenshots of OOP-iframes to be compared to look for Fission rendering bugs. | * Do a crawl with Fission turned off, and a crawl with it turned on, taking screenshots of OOP-iframes to be compared to look for Fission rendering bugs. | ||
* What is the max depth of cross-origin subdocs (the amount of nested processes we'd need basically)? | |||
* How often are cross-origin iframes under 'transforms' or 'filters'? | |||
=== Answered === | |||
* Percentage of pages with visible cross-origin subdocs? Around 25%. | |||
* Frequency of 'display: none' and/or zero sized iframes. | |||
Revision as of 19:08, 30 May 2019
To help gather data on real Web content that might be helpful to the Fission teams, jwatt has a simple Web crawler (see some crawl results).
Ideas and requests
Outstanding
- Do a crawl with Fission turned off, and a crawl with it turned on, taking screenshots of OOP-iframes to be compared to look for Fission rendering bugs.
- What is the max depth of cross-origin subdocs (the amount of nested processes we'd need basically)?
- How often are cross-origin iframes under 'transforms' or 'filters'?
Answered
- Percentage of pages with visible cross-origin subdocs? Around 25%.
- Frequency of 'display: none' and/or zero sized iframes.