BugzillaWorkflowImprovements: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
See mconnor's [http://steelgryphon.com/blog/?page_id=61 A Modest Proposal] post | See mconnor's [http://steelgryphon.com/blog/?page_id=61 A Modest Proposal] post | ||
=Other ideas= | |||
It might also be good to make a list of bug states that QA people can search for which might indicate the bug needs some particular loving: | |||
e.g. | |||
* Status Whiteboard says "dupeme" | |||
* Bug is UNCONFIRMED yet it has a non-obsolete patch attached | |||
Revision as of 11:09, 29 September 2005
This is a page for suggested improvements to Bugzilla workflow
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264721
Having two states that canconfirm can put a bug in? mconnor had details here I think.
Allowing canconfirm to mark dup.
Perhaps allowing canconfirm to change the product/component?
Renaming canconfirm to "cantriage" (most of the above falls under this).
See mconnor's A Modest Proposal post
Other ideas
It might also be good to make a list of bug states that QA people can search for which might indicate the bug needs some particular loving:
e.g.
- Status Whiteboard says "dupeme"
- Bug is UNCONFIRMED yet it has a non-obsolete patch attached