Firefox/Projects/Personas Uplift Exploration/Legal Meeting 10.20.09: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with ''''Insight From Legal (Julie)'''<br> *Mozilla should absolve itself from copyright filtering<br> *Focus now is to make sure that our process complies with DMCA<br> *Several open…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*DMCA<br> | *DMCA<br> | ||
**Cleanup needed<br> | |||
**Policy on repeat infringers<br> | |||
**Other matters<br> | |||
*At what point do we filter content that we are responsible for? Before activating in gallery? <br> | *At what point do we filter content that we are responsible for? Before activating in gallery? <br> | ||
*Offensive, inappropriate<br> | *Offensive, inappropriate<br> | ||
**What are we obligated to by law (eg, child porn)<br> | |||
**What do we feel good about?<br> | |||
*Recognizable non-celebrities<br> | *Recognizable non-celebrities<br> | ||
*Whether we need to remove from local cache (see 523246) | *Whether we need to remove from local cache (see 523246) | ||
Revision as of 01:02, 23 October 2009
Insight From Legal (Julie)
- Mozilla should absolve itself from copyright filtering
- Focus now is to make sure that our process complies with DMCA
- Several open questions/issues (See below)
Tech / Scaling Issues
- If copyright filter is removed from approval process, may not need to implement a technical solution (eg, flagging system) to scale in 3.6
Open Issues / Questions for Julie to Investigate
- DMCA
- Cleanup needed
- Policy on repeat infringers
- Other matters
- Cleanup needed
- At what point do we filter content that we are responsible for? Before activating in gallery?
- Offensive, inappropriate
- What are we obligated to by law (eg, child porn)
- What do we feel good about?
- What are we obligated to by law (eg, child porn)
- Recognizable non-celebrities
- Whether we need to remove from local cache (see 523246)
- Edits
- How any of this impacts the Firefox Privacy Policy