Firebug/WeeklyUpdates/2012-05-29: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Jan Odvarko, Joe Walker, Sebastian Zartner == Firebug 1.10 == * Release 1.10a9 released last week * Some style problems already fixed * What should be the minimum required Firef...")
 
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
    
    
* We need to fix: Issue 5221: Can't debug code made with console of FB 1.9 but can do it in <1.8
* We need to fix: Issue 5221: Can't debug code made with console of FB 1.9 but can do it in <1.8
  - We need Amirjanyan
** We need Amirjanyan


== getfirebug.com ==
== getfirebug.com ==
Line 19: Line 19:
== HTTP Monitor ==
== HTTP Monitor ==
* Do we really want to use GIT submodules?
* Do we really want to use GIT submodules?
  - What is the other and better option?
** What is the other and better option?
  - Should we do just a static copy and sync manually?
** Should we do just a static copy and sync manually?
  - What's wrong with submodules?
** What's wrong with submodules?





Revision as of 18:11, 29 May 2012

Jan Odvarko, Joe Walker, Sebastian Zartner

Firebug 1.10

  • Release 1.10a9 released last week
  • Some style problems already fixed
  • What should be the minimum required Firefox version?
  • Computed panel is empty, test fails
  • We need to fix: Issue 5221: Can't debug code made with console of FB 1.9 but can do it in <1.8
    • We need Amirjanyan

getfirebug.com

  • github.com -> getfirebug.com/tests sync FIXED


HTTP Monitor

  • Do we really want to use GIT submodules?
    • What is the other and better option?
    • Should we do just a static copy and sync manually?
    • What's wrong with submodules?


Automated Tests

  • Andrew Halberstadt going to start on it 4th of July.
  • We need CouchDB one brackstass (Mozilla server) again
  • Fix manual upload of test-results in FBTest
  • Mike: adopting Net panel tests to mochitest, waiting for his results