Talk:Support:Article list: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I would most definitely like to have the about:config entry reference page, it's more advanced than "mom" but it's absolutely invaluable for many support requests, and is needed for some add-on support, as some extensions flip existing prefs.--[[User:Majken|Majken]] 15:29, 5 July 2007 (PDT) | I would most definitely like to have the about:config entry reference page, it's more advanced than "mom" but it's absolutely invaluable for many support requests, and is needed for some add-on support, as some extensions flip existing prefs.--[[User:Majken|Majken]] 15:29, 5 July 2007 (PDT) | ||
:It's useful for helpers to look up preferences, but it's not as useful to users. If we left it on mozillaZine, helpers would still have access to it.--[[User:Np|Np]] 12:20, 6 July 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:20, 6 July 2007
Regarding the items classified as reference charts: As these items seem to be the same as pages in Firefox's help browser they should be provided automatically from localization CVS for all locales that have translated them and ALSO be kept in sync with CVS (all of this must go for the en-US version too). This would minimize wasted localization effort and have other great benefits as consistency and findability/accessability too. - VilleP 10:04, 4 July 2007 (PDT)
I would most definitely like to have the about:config entry reference page, it's more advanced than "mom" but it's absolutely invaluable for many support requests, and is needed for some add-on support, as some extensions flip existing prefs.--Majken 15:29, 5 July 2007 (PDT)
- It's useful for helpers to look up preferences, but it's not as useful to users. If we left it on mozillaZine, helpers would still have access to it.--Np 12:20, 6 July 2007 (PDT)