Lightning implementing RFC6638: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| min-date-time | | min-date-time | ||
| [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6638#section-2.1 section-2.1] | | [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6638#section-2.1 section-2.1] | ||
| First defined in the [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4791#section-5.2.6 RFC 4791] which describes the earliest value can be in a calendar object resource. | | First defined in the [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4791#section-5.2.6 RFC 4791] which describes the earliest date/time value can be in a calendar object resource. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| max-date-time | | max-date-time | ||
| [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6638#section-2.1 section-2.1] | | [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6638#section-2.1 section-2.1] | ||
| First defined in the [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4791#section-5.2.6 RFC 4791] which describes the latest value can be in a calendar object resource. | | First defined in the [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4791#section-5.2.6 RFC 4791] which describes the latest date/time value can be in a calendar object resource. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
Revision as of 07:23, 18 May 2014
This page shows the overview implementation of Bug 100390 for Google Summer of Code 2014.
Abstract
This page specifies improve Lightning scheduling system by implementing latest CalDav features described in RFC 6638 and writing mozmill tests to cover various invitation scenarios. Also, this project requires identify where Lightning code-base lags behind RFC 6638 and update to newly introduced properties.
The properties which have been identified and selected to be updated are displayed in the table below.
Properties that will be addressed
| ID | Change(Property) | Section in RFC | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | min-date-time | section-2.1 | First defined in the RFC 4791 which describes the earliest date/time value can be in a calendar object resource. |
| 2 | max-date-time | section-2.1 | First defined in the RFC 4791 which describes the latest date/time value can be in a calendar object resource. |
| 3 | max-attendees-per-instance | section-2.1 | First defined in the RFC 4791 which indicates the maximum number of attendees can have for an instance of any calendar object resource |
| 4 | SCHEDULE-FORCE-SEND | section-7.2 | This can be defined on both organizer and attendee to send forced invitations without affecting to the original object resources, whenever the server reluctant to send normal scheduling messages. |
| 5 | Schedule-Tag | section-3.2.10 | Works along with If-Schedule-Tag-Match property when merging changes. |
| 6 | If-Schedule-Tag-Match | section-8.3 | This will replace the HTTP etag based property IF-MATCH. |
| 7 | schedule-default-calendar-URL | section-4.3 | Specifies whether a calendar user has a default calendar collection to save calendar object resources. |
| 8 | MKCALENDAR | rfc4791 | This has been defined in RFC 4791 first to allow calendar users to create several remote calendars on servers. |
| 9 | Allowed attendee changes | section-3.2.2.1 | Attendees are allowed to do minor changes in attendee object resources. Such as Transparent property. |
TODOs
| Property | Description | Header text |
|---|---|---|
| Example | Example | Example |
| Example | Example | Example |
| Example | Example | Example |