Calendar:QA Chat:2007-10-18:Log

mschroeder: Let's start the QA Chat. 
[09:39am] davida joined the chat room.
[09:41am] mschroeder: We have one maybe critical bug. (bug 400289)
[09:41am] firebot: mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400289 nor,
 --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, import of timezones wrong with WCAP server
  (litmus test 3050)
[09:41am] ctalbert_busy: What about the other bugs that have been marked as 
blocking-0.7-?
[09:41am] You are now known as ctalbert.
[09:41am] mschroeder: And what about bug 400282?
[09:42am] firebot: mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400282 nor,
 --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, Events starting and/or ending during the extra
  hour on daylight saving time end day not shown or sho
[09:42am] mschroeder: okay... I'll try to query those.
[09:43am] ctalbert: mschroeder: bug 400289 is an event "inside" the time shift. 
 I don't think it should block 0.7
[09:43am] Andreas: 400289 is a good bug for Daniel 
[09:43am] ctalbert: That's what we thought too.   He was going to take a look at
 it.  I don't know if he added anything there.
[09:44am] ssitter joined the chat room.
[09:44am] ssitter was promoted to operator by ChanServ.
[09:44am] Andreas: May a unpatched sever (wrong New York time)?
[09:44am] mschroeder: http://tinyurl.com/35g2h6 blocking? bugs with changes in the
 last 7 days.
[09:44am] ctalbert: Sounds like that may be the issue.
[09:44am] Andreas: ctalber:thanks
[09:45am] ssitter: hi folks
[09:45am] mschroeder: Hi Stefan
[09:45am] ctalbert: hi
[09:46am] Andreas: hi
[09:47am] mschroeder: ctalbert: you meant 400282 not 400289, right?
[09:48am] Archaeopteryx joined the chat room.
[09:48am] mschroeder: We should talk about the new blocking? bugs.
[09:48am] mschroeder: First one: bug 348666
[09:48am] firebot: mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348666
 enh, --, Future, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, iMIP Needs to handle rescheduling appointments
[09:48am] mschroeder: Hi Archaeopteryx
[09:49am] Archaeopteryx: hi
[09:49am] mschroeder: imo not blocking
[09:50am] ctalbert: +1
[09:51am] mschroeder: ctalbert: Should we minus, comment or leave the bug alone?
[09:51am] ctalbert: minus it.  It's on my list already we're not going to lose it
[09:53am] mschroeder: ctalbert: can I say it is on the roadmap for the next release?
[09:53am] ctalbert: yes, most definitely
[09:54am] mschroeder: Next one: bug 354883
[09:54am] firebot: mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354883 
nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, subscribing missed events - dialog fires when 
alarm is off
[09:54am] firebot: mschroeder@mozilla.x-home.org denied blocking-calendar0.7 on 
bug 348666.
[09:54am] mvl joined the chat room.
[09:54am] ctalbert: I think that 354883 is not really blocking, though it is annoying
[09:57am] mschroeder: ctalbert: Should I minus it?
[09:58am] firebot: ctalbert@mozilla.com denied review for attachment 218559 on 
bug 328996.
[09:58am] firebot: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328996 nor, 
--, ---, gekacheka@yahoo.com, ASSI, guessSystemTimezone doesn't take northern/southern 
hemisphere into account
[09:58am] ctalbert: yes, I'd minus all of these that we aren't going to take.
[09:59am] LpSolit joined the chat room.
[09:59am] ctalbert: mvl: you came in a bit late, we're discussing the bugs that got
 ? blocking status in the last seven days: http://tinyurl.com/35g2h6
[09:59am] ctalbert: (as a place to start)
[10:00am] firebot: mschroeder@mozilla.x-home.org denied blocking-calendar0.7 on 
bug 354883.
[10:00am] mschroeder: Next one: bug 361635
[10:00am] firebot: mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361635 
nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, Need to support incoming updates to existing 
iTIP/iMIP invitations
[10:01am] mschroeder: imo not blocking
[10:01am] ctalbert: not blocking
[10:01am] mschroeder: but on the roadmap, correct?
[10:01am] ctalbert: yep
[10:02am] ctalbert: mschroeder: did you already discuss bug 356569?  I'm a little 
confused by that one.
[10:02am] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356569
 enh, --, 0.7, daniel.boelzle@sun.com, ASSI, [proto subscriptions] No ability to view
  other people's calendars (i.e. calendars I have subscribed
[10:02am] firebot: mschroeder@mozilla.x-home.org denied blocking-calendar0.7 on bug
 361635.
[10:02am] mschroeder: It was set blocking? long ago, so I skipped it.
[10:03am] ctalbert: Well, it has a patch that is up for review.  But it also has 
patches that have been checked in.
[10:03am] ctalbert: Andreas, Ulf, do you know if this is intended for 0.7?
[10:03am] Andreas: No, sorry.
[10:04am] ctalbert: I guess by "this" I mean the new patch on bug 356569
[10:04am] mschroeder: The patch was attached yesterday or today and I don't think 
it is for 0.7.
[10:04am] • ctalbert is going to add a note asking why they didn't file a new bug 
for that then.
[10:04am] ctalbert: ok, thx
[10:04am] mschroeder: Next one: bug 367186
[10:05am] firebot: mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367186
 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, Migration wizard hangs when importing an empty
  ICS file from calendar extension
[10:07am] daniel__ joined the chat room.
[10:07am] daniel__ is now known as daniel_.
[10:08am] ulf: ctalbert: sorry, was setting up WCAP account for andunix
[10:08am] ctalbert: This is a valid upgrade issue.  I'm not sure how many people will
 see it.
[10:08am] ctalbert: ulf: that's ok.
[10:08am] ulf: ctalbert: no this was not intended in 0.7 time frame
[10:08am] ctalbert: daniel_: what do you think about bug 367186?  Should we take it 
for 0.7
[10:08am] ctalbert: ulf: ok, thanks
[10:09am] ctalbert: everyone else can chime in on 367186 too
[10:09am] mschroeder:
[10:09am] ctalbert: My thought is that if enough people are likely to still be on 0.2
 then we should fix it for 0.7.  But if we dn't think a bunch of people are on 0.2 
 anymore, then we can just fix it in 0.8.
[10:10am] mschroeder: I think, we should take it.
[10:11am] ulf: mschroeder: 0.2 ->0.7 ?
[10:12am] mschroeder: I read about it in newsgroup or blog comments. There are 
really people updating from 0.2.
[10:13am] ctalbert: We know that we have far more people on 0.3 than we do on 0.5.
  We don't have any metrics for how many might still be on 0.2.
[10:13am] ctalbert: But I believe there are some out there.  But, is this worth an 
RC3?
[10:14am] ctalbert: Or should we ship and release note it?
[10:14am] ulf: folks, I can't really imagine to delay 0.7 because of people who may 
be updating from zero dot two
[10:14am] mschroeder: If you think relnoting is enough, that's okay with me.
[10:14am] ulf: I'd vote for release-noting it
[10:15am] Andreas: +1
[10:15am] ctalbert: I don't think it is worth the cost of doing an RC3 and slipping
 further.
[10:15am] ctalbert: I'll tag it for release noting
[10:15am] ulf: ctalbert: completely agreed
[10:15am] ulf: ctalbert: thx!
[10:15am] mschroeder: Next and last one from my list: bug 399660 (I skipped some old
 ones!)
[10:15am] firebot: mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399660 
nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, Wrong tab opened in the prefs panel when 
clicking the "Preferences" button in the addons panel
[10:16am] Andreas: non blocking
[10:17am] ctalbert: yeah, that's not going to hurt anyone.
[10:17am] ctalbert: It's just annoying.
[10:17am] mschroeder: +1
[10:17am] ulf: +1
[10:17am] mschroeder: ctalbert: can you minus it?
[10:18am] mschroeder: Andreas: What about your bug 400267?
[10:18am] firebot: mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400267
 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, short events besides a whole-day spanning 
 event are leaving the time scale grid
[10:19am] Andreas: I think this is non blocking.
[10:19am] mschroeder: okay
[10:20am] firebot: ctalbert@mozilla.com denied blocking-calendar0.7 on bug 399660.
[10:20am] • ulf also thinks it shouldn't block
[10:20am] ctalbert: Reading overthe entire list of blocking ? bugs, I don't see 
anything that we should desperately have in 0.7 that I would be comfortable taking.
[10:21am] mschroeder: Anyone thinks bug 400282 should block?
[10:21am] firebot: mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400282
 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, Events starting and/or ending during the extra
  hour on daylight saving time end day not shown or sho
[10:21am] Andreas: look at the attached sreenshoot. This is more concept art than a 
common event scedule
[10:22am] mschroeder: lol
[10:22am] ulf: well, if that one was reproducible, it was a good catch, but not 
necessarily blocking
[10:22am] ctalbert: This one should probably not block.  It's a time inside the 
time shift window, and that will be something we'll want to look at in 0.8 once 
the timezone code lands.
[10:22am] ulf: like that one: concept art
[10:23am] mschroeder: So we have bug 400289 left which should be investigated.
[10:23am] firebot: mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400289 
nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, import of timezones wrong with WCAP server
 (litmus test 3050)
[10:23am] ctalbert: That would should block, at least until we can determine if this
 is a WCAP server issue or not, I think.
[10:24am] ctalbert: Otherwise, we're going to make a lot of Sun users mad.
[10:24am] ulf: afaik daniel is having a look at that one atm?
[10:24am] mschroeder: sorry guys, I have to leave
[10:24am] • ctalbert thinks so
[10:24am] ctalbert: bye mschroeder
[10:24am] mschroeder is now known as mschroeder|away.
[10:24am] mschroeder|away: see you later 
[10:25am] Andreas: bye
[10:25am] ctalbert: I'll leave the blocking determination on 400289 to you, Andreas,
 Ulf, and Daniel.  Whatever you think is best since this one does seem to be WCAP
  specific
[10:26am] ulf: ctalbert: I think TZ and WCAP are well tested  - so I can't really
 believe what I've read
[10:27am] ctalbert: Looking over the entire blocking list, I only see one that I 
would take: bug 377487.  But, I'd be too scared of the regressions.
[10:27am] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377487 
cri, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, Freeze (hang) on .ics file which has BYYEARDAY 
and BYDAY in an RRULE
[10:27am] ulf: anyway, needs further evaluation
[10:27am] ctalbert: yeah
[10:28am] ssitter: if we have to do a RC3 we should take Bug 385155 too
[10:28am] firebot: ssitter: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385155 nor,
 --, ---, daniel.boelzle@sun.com, ASSI, Reminder /alarm dialog doesn't show times in 
 configured timezone
[10:28am] ctalbert: ssitter +1
[10:29am] ctalbert: The QA Chat is about over.  We'll need to turn the channel back
 over to the ongoing testday.
[10:29am] ctalbert: Does anyone else have a bug we should take if we do an RC3?
[10:29am] ctalbert: (of course this is all assuming we don't find something during 
the rest of the test day today)
[10:31am] • ulf still prefers to get along w/o an RC3 if possible
[10:32am] • ssitter too
[10:34am] firebot: New Calendar - Lightning Only bug 400298 filed by blerner@cs.washington.edu.
[10:34am] firebot: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400298 enh, --,
 ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, Integrate single-day view into today pane
[10:34am] firebot: blerner@cs.washington.edu added attachment 285387 to bug 400298.
[10:35am] ctalbert: yeah, me too.
[10:35am] ctalbert: Well, let's see what we find in the test day. 
[10:36am] ctalbert: I'll roll up the QA Chat portion of this and put it on the wiki.