Calendar:QA Chat:2008-06-19:Log
From MozillaWiki
[18:30] <mschroeder> hi Andreas [18:30] <Andreas> Hi mschroeder [18:31] <mschroeder> Welcome to the QA chat everybody. :) [18:32] <mschroeder> Our (short) agenda: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Calendar:QA_Chat:2008-06-19 [18:35] <mschroeder> First topic: QA status for 0.9 [18:35] <Andreas> okay [18:35] <mschroeder> Andreas: I think you have a better overview than me at the moment. [18:35] <Andreas> Maybe. [18:36] <Andreas> Okay, at the moment I try to verify the fixed bugs. [18:37] <Andreas> Also I try to start with litmus testing again to find regressions. [18:38] <mschroeder> My impression is that we have more bugs at the UI level and fewer in the backend code at moment. [18:38] <mschroeder> ... for new bugs. [18:39] <Andreas> Yes, war on boxes is back :-( [18:39] <mschroeder> who solved it last time? mickey? [18:40] <Andreas> Yes, and thats the problem. [18:40] <Andreas> Berend will fix this bugs now. [18:40] <mschroeder> ah, okay. [18:41] <Andreas> Berend and Christian works together to fix the UI glitches. [18:42] <mschroeder> I have a long lists of bugs I want to check for severity or confirm the first time. [18:42] <Andreas> Okay. [18:42] <mschroeder> I'll do some triaging over the weekend. [18:43] <Andreas> nice to hear that. :-) [18:43] <mschroeder> maybe also some verifying [18:43] <mschroeder> and I have a plan... concerning our next QA actions [18:44] <Andreas> Sounds realy good. [18:45] <mschroeder> we should have four events the next four weeks. [18:45] <Andreas> Okay [18:45] <mschroeder> at least that's what I think is needed [18:46] <mschroeder> because it's less than a month until string freeze [18:47] <dbo> Andreas: maybe you could comment on your recent leak tests in that bug [18:47] <Andreas> @dbo: Okay [18:48] <dbo> it sounds like it's WCAP only :( [18:48] <dbo> and ics is not leaking any longer [18:48] <dbo> which fits Bas experience [18:48] <Andreas> The leak is caused by wcap recurring events. [18:49] <dbo> though I don't yet understand the core problem, because ics parsing is *very* similar to what's going on in the ics provider [18:49] <dbo> resp. calIcsParser.js [18:49] <Andreas> Same calender exported to ics and stored on a webdav server do not leak. [18:51] <mschroeder> Andreas: what would you suggest for the events? at least two test days imo. [18:52] <Andreas> Yes, why not. [18:55] <mschroeder> so next week... should we try a testday again although the last one wasn't successful? [18:56] <Andreas> Yes, I thinks so. We have no choice. [18:57] <Andreas> Do you hav any plan for this next testday? [18:58] <Andreas> Maybe a Litmus only testday? [18:59] <mschroeder> we can try... a 'find the most hidden regression' testday ;) [19:00] <Andreas> Thats a greate motivation for all testers, I think. ;-) [19:01] <mschroeder> I try to come up with a motivating announcement [19:04] <mschroeder> okay... I think we discussed all topic from the agenda ;) [19:04] <mschroeder> anything else [19:04] <mschroeder> ? [19:05] <Andreas> No. [19:06] <mschroeder> good. then I can start preparing for the quarterfinal. ;)