1
edit
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
Thunderbird should allow us to compose our own signature in Thunderbird. ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219197 bug 219197]) Not to mention have a different signature for new emails and/or replying to emails, like Outlook has. ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73567 bug 73567], [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226120 bug 226120]) | Thunderbird should allow us to compose our own signature in Thunderbird. ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219197 bug 219197]) Not to mention have a different signature for new emails and/or replying to emails, like Outlook has. ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73567 bug 73567], [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226120 bug 226120]) | ||
Comment: I would be really pleased if the double-dashes preceding signatures can be done away with. I've read the arguments for them (essentially, that's how it was done on Usenet) but they really don't hold water. If people like them, let them add them. | |||
Comment: It would also be nice to be able to provide '''both''' a text version and a HTML version of the same signature. Right now, when sending a plain-text message while a HTML signature is specified, the HTML is auto-converted to text, which doesn't always produce the desired result. -- [[User:Vor0nwe|vor0nwe]] 09:22, 2 November 2006 (PST) | Comment: It would also be nice to be able to provide '''both''' a text version and a HTML version of the same signature. Right now, when sending a plain-text message while a HTML signature is specified, the HTML is auto-converted to text, which doesn't always produce the desired result. -- [[User:Vor0nwe|vor0nwe]] 09:22, 2 November 2006 (PST) | ||
edit