346
edits
Accessibility/Captioning Work Plan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Accessibility/Captioning Work Plan (view source)
Revision as of 09:42, 4 August 2008
, 4 August 2008no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
##semantics and style, etc. (This seems like a pretty big departure from baseline established by TV captioning. [[User:Hsivonen|Hsivonen]] 09:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)) [[User:aaronlev|aaronlev]] I'm not sure -- there are some higher level things such as embedding of a musical note graphic to indicate music. I believe that captioning is moving toward expressing more complex background information. | ##semantics and style, etc. (This seems like a pretty big departure from baseline established by TV captioning. [[User:Hsivonen|Hsivonen]] 09:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)) [[User:aaronlev|aaronlev]] I'm not sure -- there are some higher level things such as embedding of a musical note graphic to indicate music. I believe that captioning is moving toward expressing more complex background information. | ||
# Ensure captioning solution is compatible with current authoring and if possible, video conversion tools, so that current and future content can easily use the solution | # Ensure captioning solution is compatible with current authoring and if possible, video conversion tools, so that current and future content can easily use the solution | ||
# Ensure the solution is compatible with both existing media repurposed for the Internet (i.e., originating in broadcast and cable TV environments and physical media like DVDs and theatrical motion pictures) and media originally developed for Internet distribution, including user-generated content. | |||
# Ensure the solition incorporates the expressed needs and preferences of Internet-based media users with sensory disabilities. (( Aaron: what are these? Can we express these up front? WGBH must already know this info, e.g. why would it change based on internet vs. brodcast? )) | |||
# Determine what can be done about supporting captioning when an external back end (gstreamer, QuickTime, DirectShow) is in use. (MP4 containers are the most likely external back end case, so 3GPP Timed Text is a potential format candidate in that case.) | # Determine what can be done about supporting captioning when an external back end (gstreamer, QuickTime, DirectShow) is in use. (MP4 containers are the most likely external back end case, so 3GPP Timed Text is a potential format candidate in that case.) | ||
# Build test cases -- we need x testcases with y features | # Build test cases -- we need x testcases with y features | ||