Confirmed users
429
edits
Gaia/Build/RefactoringToNodejs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Gaia/Build/RefactoringToNodejs (view source)
Revision as of 04:04, 30 January 2015
, 30 January 2015→Profit from Node.js
Ricky Chien (talk | contribs) (→Q & A) |
Ricky Chien (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Web developers are familiar with JavaScript, also [http://nodejs.org/ Node.js] is the most popular and acceptable for those who are familiar with client side JavaScript. It could attract more contributors to involve and improve Firefox OS. | * Web developers are familiar with JavaScript, also [http://nodejs.org/ Node.js] is the most popular and acceptable for those who are familiar with client side JavaScript. It could attract more contributors to involve and improve Firefox OS. | ||
* NPM is a well-known build-in package manager of node, such tool is commonly used for web developers for years. It will make your life easier that developers can install third-party libraries and prevent us to reinvent the wheel if there is no such library provided by XULRunner. | * NPM is a well-known build-in package manager of node, such tool is commonly used for web developers for years. It will make your life easier that developers can install third-party libraries and prevent us to reinvent the wheel if there is no such library provided by XULRunner. | ||
* It would be great if we build up a pure JS system. To re-implement Makefile | * It would be great if we build up a pure JS system. To re-implement Makefile into JS is a hard work without third-party library, NPM provides a bunch of packages that let us build our pure JS system more quickly, flexible and maintainable. | ||
= Plan = | = Plan = | ||