Auto-tools/Projects/ActiveData/Redshift: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
formatting
m (formatting)
m (formatting)
Line 128: Line 128:
It is apparent to me now that a performance comparison cannot be thorough without a product specialist to guide the optimization process.  Absent of a specialist how can one decide if a new product is better?  We run the risk of over analysis, driven by fear of missing a shallow optimization.  Clearly, if the product performs better out-of-the-box than your existing, (assumed optimized) solution, then the answer is easy.  But, even “out-of-the-box” can take a significant amount of time, like this case of Redshift.
It is apparent to me now that a performance comparison cannot be thorough without a product specialist to guide the optimization process.  Absent of a specialist how can one decide if a new product is better?  We run the risk of over analysis, driven by fear of missing a shallow optimization.  Clearly, if the product performs better out-of-the-box than your existing, (assumed optimized) solution, then the answer is easy.  But, even “out-of-the-box” can take a significant amount of time, like this case of Redshift.


== More References ===
== More References ==
These links were a help, and are more relevant to scaling Redshift in general.
These links were a help, and are more relevant to scaling Redshift in general.
* http://dailytechnology.net/2013/08/03/redshift-what-you-need-to-know/
* http://dailytechnology.net/2013/08/03/redshift-what-you-need-to-know/
* http://blog.blazeclan.com/what-is-amazon-redshift-11-key-points-remember/
* http://blog.blazeclan.com/what-is-amazon-redshift-11-key-points-remember/
Confirmed users
513

edits

Navigation menu