Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
421
edits
(decomplicated the in-triage flag.) |
(Update of the project for July 20th 2015.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''<big>Improving the triage process.</big>''' | '''<big><strike>Improving the triage process.</strike></big>''' | ||
Mike Hoye and Marcia Knous have a Q2/ | '''<big>TRIAGE ALL THE THINGS</big>''' | ||
Mike Hoye and Marcia Knous have a Q2/Q3 goal of triaging 100% of daily incoming bugs. In order to accomplish this, we have stood up TriageBot, a public-facing service aimed at connecting contributors with bugs that need love. | |||
Triagebot is live now (July 20th) and we're passing it around to Mozilla's staff, Reps, and student ambassadors. The plan currently is to keep it running as-is, measure our results after approximately 2 weeks and start advertising it more widely as we start to see success. | |||
'''<big>This is only a first step.</big>''' | |||
Getting a bug into the right component matters a lot, but it's not the only thing. Triage is not a binary state, but a process whose goal is to get a bug from "an unconfirmed issue from an new contributor" to "a well-defined problem that the responsible engineer can make an informed decision about". Ideally the bug would be low- or no-touch for that engineer up until it reaches that ready state; realistically, getting it as far down that path as possible before it needs attention would be a victory. | |||
To get there, a bug may need: | To get there, a bug may need: | ||
| Line 19: | Line 24: | ||
* Other clarification | * Other clarification | ||
We intend to expand and refine Gijs' triage-helper addon to facilitate this process. | |||
An outline of our planned approach from earlier in the project follows: | |||
'''<big>Our proposed approach (v1.2) is:</big>''' | '''<big>Our proposed approach (v1.2) is:</big>''' | ||