Confirmed users
15
edits
mNo edit summary |
(Added FAQ section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
If the user was unable to enter admin credentials, or if the new ownership/permissions couldn't be set successfully, the update will fail and we will increment a counter in the user's profile. Once a threshold is hit, we will no longer attempt to stage an update and will direct the user to our website for a manual install (existing workflow). | If the user was unable to enter admin credentials, or if the new ownership/permissions couldn't be set successfully, the update will fail and we will increment a counter in the user's profile. Once a threshold is hit, we will no longer attempt to stage an update and will direct the user to our website for a manual install (existing workflow). | ||
=== FAQ === | |||
====== '''What's the risk of these additional permissions and/or the new group ownership if Firefox gets owned?''' ====== | |||
The new proposal calls for setting the group ownership of Firefox to "wheel" and adding "write" permission for this group. Due to the fact that: | |||
# only an administrator can grant these additional permissions | |||
# the additional permissions are restricted to administrators | |||
# any administrator could already set these additional permissions manually | |||
# most apps installed via a .pkg installer (instead of a .dmg like Firefox) already set these same permissions on their apps | |||
# most users "own" Firefox.app because they installed it, so they already have rwx permissions | |||
there shouldn't be any additional risk in the case that Firefox gets owned. | |||
====== '''What happens when Firefox is updated?''' ====== | |||
The ownership/permissions for new or changed files should be inherited from the main Firefox.app bundle, i.e. <username>:wheel and rwxrwxr-x (for executable files) or rw-rw-r--. | |||