106
edits
Electrolysis/Meetings/2016-02-04: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Electrolysis/Meetings/2016-02-04 (view source)
Revision as of 17:15, 4 February 2016
, 4 February 2016chutten responsiveness
(meeting notes) |
(chutten responsiveness) |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
Next steps: repeat this analysis excluding people with addons, continue to file and prioritize the content process topcrash list: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/search/?ActiveExperiment=e10s-beta45-withaddons%40experiments.mozilla.org&process_type=content&_facets=signature&_columns=date&_columns=signature&_columns=product&_columns=version&_columns=build_id&_columns=platform#facet-signature | Next steps: repeat this analysis excluding people with addons, continue to file and prioritize the content process topcrash list: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/search/?ActiveExperiment=e10s-beta45-withaddons%40experiments.mozilla.org&process_type=content&_facets=signature&_columns=date&_columns=signature&_columns=product&_columns=version&_columns=build_id&_columns=platform#facet-signature | ||
== chutten == | |||
Responsiveness analysis using preliminary data shows a possible 2% higher rate of janks as measured by BHR in e10s. This number requires further analysis. | |||
Looking at INPUT_EVENT_RESPONSE_MS in {{bug|1223780}} (and, to a lesser extent, the parent-process-only EVENTLOOP_UI_ACTIVITY_MS) shows no obvious trend, so maybe these janks are not user visible. | |||
Checking the distribution of gecko activity as per {{bug|1182637}} shows a dramatic shift to the left as expected after the fix to idle BHR reports . | |||
Note: this is on preliminary data, so it might be skewed by early adopters. | |||