Confirmed users
1,016
edits
L20n/Firefox/Performance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Potential Performance improvements
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
* cache formatted entries | * cache formatted entries | ||
* cache localized DOM | * cache localized DOM | ||
Caching the first two going to be significantly easier. | |||
=== Move DOM operations earlier === | === Move DOM operations earlier === | ||
| Line 54: | Line 56: | ||
:smaug is profiling our code trying to find ways to reduce the cost of Element reflections and applying translations. | :smaug is profiling our code trying to find ways to reduce the cost of Element reflections and applying translations. | ||
=== Stylo === | |||
Stylo may significantly improve the cost of Node reflection that is currently, according to :smaug, slowed down by CSS checking for XBL bindings. | |||
=== JIT optimizations === | |||
There are two parts of l20n bootstrap that are JS heavy - FTL parsing and Entry formatting. Both can benefit from JS/JIT optimizations and/or caching. | |||
==Research Avenues== | ==Research Avenues== | ||