QA/Flash SHIELD Experiment: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 134: Line 134:
== Overview ==
== Overview ==
  Summary of testing scenarios
  Summary of testing scenarios
1. URL
*Verify allowed list is applied - ''Flash is included in the navigator.plugins, Flash instances are activated immediately''
*Verify blocked list is applied - ''Flash is not included in the navigator.plugins, any attempt to use Flash use fallback content''
*Verify for all essential Flash, fallback (non-Flash) format is used to shown the content
*Verify Flash content is set to Click-to-active
*Verify allowed/denied list is set to geography-specific
*User is able to enable the Flash content
*User is able to block the Flash content
*Browsers send correct telemetry data to the server
*User has explicitly set "Disallow Flash" for this site - ''Flash content should be "click to activate" / Flash is present in the navigator.plugins''
*User has explicitly set to "Allow Flash" for this site - ''Flash is present in the navigator.plugins / Flash elements are automatically activated''
2. Lists
*Check whitelisted domain - ''page loads; Flash is not set to CTA - check iframes against the list''
*Check blacklisted domain - ''page loads; Flash is not loaded - don't check iframes against the list''
*Check non-whitelisted/non-blacklisted domain page loads - ''check all iframes against the list''
3. Heuristics
*Flash has acceptable fallback content - ''Show the fallback content''
*Flash doesn't have acceptable fallback content
** ''If it pass the heuristics - set Flash to CTA''
** ''If it doesn't pass the heuristics - don't load the Flash content''


== Test Areas ==
== Test Areas ==
306

edits

Navigation menu