Firefox/Performance: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Operating principals: Add some principals
(Add operating principals)
(→‎Operating principals: Add some principals)
Line 11: Line 11:


=Operating principals=
=Operating principals=
Text goes here
* Our work should impact key user interactions of the browser front-end. From a high-level, these are:
** Browser startup
** Tab operations
*** Opening
*** Closing
*** Switching
*** Drag and drop
*** Scrolling
** Window operations
*** Opening
*** Closing
*** Focusing
** Menu operations
*** Opening
*** Closing
*** Navigating submenus / subviews
** URL bar operations
*** Showing the URL bar panel
*** Showing results in the URL bar panel
** Jank that can occur at seemingly random times in the parent process
** Browser shutdown
* If you notice a pattern of performance issues, it is better to try to address the pattern in general than to spot fix individual instances.
** The playbook is usually: create a whitelist of pre-existing cases of the bad behaviour to make adding new cases impossible, then whittle down the whitelist. Once the whitelist is empty, remove the whitelist.
** '''Example''': Making main-thread IO impossible is better than fixing a single instance of main-thread IO. We should aim to have a whitelist of places where main-thread IO is currently used, and crash if new main-thread IO is added. We should then file bugs to whittle down the whitelist.
* If you improve something, try to write regression tests to ensure it doesn't get worse. Mochitests are preferred, as Talos tests can be too noisy to be truly useful.
** '''Example:''' We moved a lot of scripts so that they don't run until after first paint. There are still some scripts remaining, and we've added a whitelist for those scripts. This ensures that the problem we identified cannot get worse, and only better.
** '''Example:''' We've eliminated some synchronous layout flushes caused by our JavaScript code, and have written tests to exercise the user interactions that caused them. Those tests ensure that a whitelist of synchronous layout flushes are possible, which makes it much harder to accidentally add new ones in the future.


=Contact=
=Contact=
Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
1,006

edits

Navigation menu