1,698
edits
Add-ons/Reviewers/Content Review Guidelines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Add-ons/Reviewers/Content Review Guidelines (view source)
Revision as of 16:58, 28 April 2020
, 28 April 2020→Focus of Content Review: exception for recommended and mozilla extensions
Caitmuenster (talk | contribs) (added link to example doc) |
Caitmuenster (talk | contribs) (→Focus of Content Review: exception for recommended and mozilla extensions) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Focus of Content Review== | ==Focus of Content Review== | ||
The goal of content review is to screen listings on AMO for spam, abuse, and inappropriate content. Content reviewers do not review the code of extensions submitted to AMO unless they have been specifically trained to do so. | The goal of content review is to screen listings on AMO for spam, abuse, and inappropriate content. Content reviewers do not review the code of extensions submitted to AMO unless they have been specifically trained to do so. | ||
=== Exceptions === | |||
Add-ons that are in the [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/search/?recommended=true&sort=random&type=extension Recommended Extensions Program] or that have been developed by [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/user/4757633/ an internal team at Mozilla] are exempt from content review. This is because the add-ons team is actively managing relationships with those developers and is working with them on their AMO listing. | |||
If you have any questions about any of these extensions, please ask an admin. | |||
==Guidelines for Content Review== | ==Guidelines for Content Review== | ||