Changes

* Do we have shared versions of basic Seneca tools for use by others, especially prototype student project pool web site and updated Real World Mozilla course?

* To what extent did we achieve Is there interest in using the goal of expanding materials and infrastructure that Seneca activities to include and/or support non-is sharing? Are Seneca institutions and people (e.g.Mozilla happy with what has been produced?** In particular, do we see early evidence that students, per professors and mentors are planning to use these resources in the checklist above)2009/2010 academic year? If 'no', is this an issue of promotion or interest?* Is everything Do we have the materials and people in place to have a successful first course at URJC?* What worked with the Did people participate in first Mozilla community courses? Did the participating Mozilla projects get useful outcomes? If 'no', and should be repeated for subsequent courses? What needs do we need to be changed, and howimprove our approach or kill this idea?* Do Are we have a solid plan for evolving starting to see traffic and use on the EMO, including detailed budget and task listssite? (OrIf 'no', if we decide EMO is not the way to go, do we have does this indicate a lack of interest or a solid plan need for how to meet the need we thought we were meeting with EMOimprovements?)

* Hold Deliver at least two one Mozilla community courses, ideally more.* Evaluate the usefulness of the EMO prototype (e.g., based on traffic, content, comparison with related sites) and plan how it might evolve. (In particular, whether : should it remains remain a simple portal only or should take on other functions.)?