Confirm
610
edits
Changes
m
→Q4 2009: Fix 2009 -> 2010 typo
* Did the URJC Mozilla Technology course generate good learning outcomes for participants? Was URJC happy with outcomes? Did we produce re-usable course materials? If 'yes' on most, consider second phase. If 'no', question whether worthwhile to do again.
* Do any major tweaks need to be made to the Mozilla community courses for 2009? Should we bring all instructor duties inhouse (as part-time or full-time staff)?
* Is EMO important enough to evolve into a "first-class object" (e.g., comparable to SUMO, QMO, AMO, MDC) during 20092010?
* What is our overall assessment of Mozilla Education activities in 2009? What are the answers to our core design and thesis questions? In 2010, should we expand, evolve our experiments or kill the program?
