CA/Required or Recommended Practices: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎CP/CPS Documents will be Reviewed!: Added review of KIR's CPS
(→‎CP/CPS Documents will be Reviewed!: Added review of ACIN-GTS)
(→‎CP/CPS Documents will be Reviewed!: Added review of KIR's CPS)
Line 48: Line 48:
your CP/CPS documentation will be thoroughly reviewed and commented on. Concerns raised by the reviewer must be sufficiently resolved before the request will be allowed to enter [[CA/Application_Verification#Public_discussion|public discussion]].  
your CP/CPS documentation will be thoroughly reviewed and commented on. Concerns raised by the reviewer must be sufficiently resolved before the request will be allowed to enter [[CA/Application_Verification#Public_discussion|public discussion]].  


Here are some examples of previous reviews of CP/CPS documents:
Here are previous reviews of CP/CPS documents:
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1705904#c20 BR Review of KIR's CPS]
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1454977#c52 Detailed BR and EV Review Feedback to ACIN - Global Trusted Sign]
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1454977#c52 Detailed BR and EV Review Feedback to ACIN - Global Trusted Sign]
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102143#c38 Detailed BR and EV Review Feedback on Firmaprofesional's CPS]
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102143#c38 Detailed BR and EV Review Feedback on Firmaprofesional's CPS]
Confirmed users
569

edits

Navigation menu