Accessibility/Video a11y Study08: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
added conclusions section
(fixed image width)
(added conclusions section)
Line 218: Line 218:


== Conclusions ==
== Conclusions ==
The aim of the study was to "deliver a well thought-out recommendation for how to support the different types of accessibility needs for audio and video, including a specification of the actual file format(s) to use. At minimum, a Ogg solution for captions and subtitles is expected, and a means towards including sign language video tracks, audio annotations, transcripts, scripts, story boards, karaoke, metadata, and semantic annotations is proposed."
This aim of the grant proposal was achieved with great success. In fact, we have gone beyond this aim and created a community at Ogg to continue addressing these issues. And we have gone far beyond a recommendation by also creating initial specifications that address each of the four identified areas of work, in particular:
* for how to include subtitles into Web pages with a <video> element,
* for how to encapsulate time-aligned text into Ogg, and
* a format for the richer time-aligned text data.
In the next step, Mozilla should look at implementing srt support into the Web browser, and in parallel further analyse the richer time-aligned text categories and their needs. In collaboration with the Xiph community, srt in Ogg should also be addressed.
Given all this, the grant was a great success and the resulting study points us the way forward.

Navigation menu