QA/Execution/Meetings/2009-02-11: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 18: Line 18:
*** ''discussion'' - for content issues, should we review what content is posted before allowing it on QMO?  '''(marcia)''' and '''(tomcat)''' to work on a policy guide.
*** ''discussion'' - for content issues, should we review what content is posted before allowing it on QMO?  '''(marcia)''' and '''(tomcat)''' to work on a policy guide.
**** Any update on this?
**** Any update on this?
***  Opinion: Defining guidelines and expecting contributors to follow those guidelines is a good idea. However, throwing up road blocks to the community is a terrible idea.  This isn't software code that requires a review process to protect an application.  Just deal with inappropriate content as it shows up. Has it been an overwhelming problem so far?  (Tracy)


= Project Updates =
= Project Updates =
Confirmed users
4,072

edits

Navigation menu