canmove, Confirmed users
7,108
edits
QA/Execution/Meetings/2009-02-11: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
QA/Execution/Meetings/2009-02-11 (view source)
Revision as of 18:37, 11 February 2009
, 11 February 2009no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*** It has become clear that we need to both have a process for promoting people to Community Leads as well as some control over people adding content. Today I noticed that someone had added "It's okay we don't bite" to the Community FAQ - I edited that content out, but we can't just let people add content willy nilly. There needs to be some sort of review process. One thing that Tomcat mentioned is to have people create bugs and then have a QA team member review + the document just like a patch. | *** It has become clear that we need to both have a process for promoting people to Community Leads as well as some control over people adding content. Today I noticed that someone had added "It's okay we don't bite" to the Community FAQ - I edited that content out, but we can't just let people add content willy nilly. There needs to be some sort of review process. One thing that Tomcat mentioned is to have people create bugs and then have a QA team member review + the document just like a patch. | ||
*** ''discussion'' - should have a vetting process for community members who want admin access. '''(marcia)''' and '''(tomcat)''' to work on a guide to demonstrate they are behaving properly. | *** ''discussion'' - should have a vetting process for community members who want admin access. '''(marcia)''' and '''(tomcat)''' to work on a guide to demonstrate they are behaving properly. | ||
**** | ''**** We have not yet created a policy document. We also need to figure out what to do with Product Community leads and whether or not they should have product specific badges?'' | ||
*** ''discussion'' - for content issues, should we review what content is posted before allowing it on QMO? '''(marcia)''' and '''(tomcat)''' to work on a policy guide. | *** ''discussion'' - for content issues, should we review what content is posted before allowing it on QMO? '''(marcia)''' and '''(tomcat)''' to work on a policy guide. | ||
**** | ''**** Content Policy guide has been created and reviewed by Tomcat. Posted to QMO on Monday. Because there is no way to know daily what content has been added, as Owner of this area I feel more comfortable having a process where we can review content. This was done informally via email in one case with stephen and a community member. This is just formalizing that process.'' | ||
*** Opinion: Defining guidelines and expecting contributors to follow those guidelines is a good idea. However, throwing up road blocks to the community is a terrible idea. This isn't software code that requires a review process to protect an application. Just deal with inappropriate content as it shows up. Has it been an overwhelming problem so far? (Tracy) | *** Opinion: Defining guidelines and expecting contributors to follow those guidelines is a good idea. However, throwing up road blocks to the community is a terrible idea. This isn't software code that requires a review process to protect an application. Just deal with inappropriate content as it shows up. Has it been an overwhelming problem so far? (Tracy) | ||