Necko: Electrolysis design and subprojects: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:


I'm not sure if we need IPC for resource:// or view-source://.  Opinions?
I'm not sure if we need IPC for resource:// or view-source://.  Opinions?
= Supporting non-e10s clients that use necko =
We're planning to surround all IPC logic with #ifdef MOZ_IPC, and if it's not defined things should simply work for single process clients and/or clients which are otherwise allergic to e10s (apparently firefox on ppc and/or OS/2?)
(Bsmedberg says that single-process XULRunner clients (such as Thunderbird) which aren't moving to multi-process will still work with our e10s code present: they simply won't use it.  So MOZ_IPC may just be for ppc and OS/2)


= Implementation issues for various protocols =
= Implementation issues for various protocols =
Confirmed users
431

edits

Navigation menu