|
|
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
| |
|
| I'm not sure if we need IPC for resource:// or view-source://. Opinions? | | I'm not sure if we need IPC for resource:// or view-source://. Opinions? |
|
| |
| = Supporting non-e10s clients that use necko =
| |
|
| |
| We're planning to surround all IPC logic with #ifdef MOZ_IPC, and if it's not defined things should simply work for single process clients and/or clients which are otherwise allergic to e10s (apparently firefox on ppc and/or OS/2?)
| |
|
| |
| (Bsmedberg says that single-process XULRunner clients (such as Thunderbird) which aren't moving to multi-process will still work with our e10s code present: they simply won't use it. So MOZ_IPC may just be for ppc and OS/2)
| |
|
| |
|
| = Implementation issues for various protocols = | | = Implementation issues for various protocols = |